Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhilasha Joshi D/O S. S. Joshi vs Chairman And Managing Director, Ongc
2024 Latest Caselaw 489 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 489 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Abhilasha Joshi D/O S. S. Joshi vs Chairman And Managing Director, Ongc on 18 January, 2024

Author: N.V.Anjaria

Bench: N.V.Anjaria

                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




     C/CA/1233/2023                               ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024

                                                                                  undefined




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.                        1233
                         of 2023

         In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 22525 of 2023

==========================================================
                   ABHILASHA JOSHI D/O S. S. JOSHI
                                Versus
                CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ONGC
==========================================================
Appearance:
PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
        and
        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

                             Date : 18/01/2024

                            ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)

Learned advocate Mr. Rituraj Meena for the respondent tenders reply affidavit on behalf of the respondent Corporation, which is taken on record. A copy thereof has been served on the applicant party-in-person, as is evident by the endorsement made by her on the first page of the affidavit.

2. The present is an application filed by the applicant praying to condone the delay of 227 days, which has taken place in filing the Letters Patent Appeal.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/CA/1233/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024

undefined

2.1 Heard applicant party-in-person Ms.Abhilasha Joshi and learned senior advocate Mr. R.R.Marshall for the respondent.

3. The applicant has preferred Letters Patent Appeal against judgment and order dated 19.09.2022 of learned Single Judge. Delay has taken place in filing the appeal.

3.1 Explaining the passage of time, it is stated by the applicant in her application that the certified copy of the order dated 19.09.2022 was applied on 28.09.2022, which was notified on25.11.2022 and was collected by her personally on 06.12.2022.

3.2 The say of the applicant is that she had to pursue several litigation and that she is unemployed since 2008 having no source of income. It was submitted that she had financially hard times to negotiate. It was stated that she also made a representation dated 12.12.2022 to the High Court Legal Services Committee for seeking free legal aid. The applicant thereafter borrowed money to engage advocate in the main matter.

3.3 It was stated by learned party-in-person that applicant's father, 94 years' old, had to undergo complicated surgery on 17.03.2023. He was required

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/CA/1233/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024

undefined

to be hospitalised and the petitioner had to attend her father. It was stated that her father had to be hospitalised again on 24.04.2023 and the money which the applicant had saved were required to be spent in the medical treatment of the father.

3.4 The case papers, it was submitted, were then handed over to the another advocate, but since the applicant was unable to spent fees of the advocate, she herself drafted the application and prepared the appeal.

4. Learned senior advocate for the respondent seriously objected to the prayers for condonation of delay by relying on the contents and averments of the affidavit-in-reply to submit that all grounds were got-up.

5. Having considered the rival case about the condonation of delay, further considering the statements made on oath by the party-in-person in the present application explaining the passage of time, it could be noticed that the party-in-person was in financial difficulties. She was out of service and litigating. Furthermore, about the ailments of her father, medical papers are produced by the party-in-person.

6. Any element of indolence could not be

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/CA/1233/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024

undefined

attributed on the facts of the case, on the part of the party-in-person.

6.1 Sufficient cause is made out. Delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly delay of 227 days is condoned.

7. The application is allowed. Rule is made absolute.

(N.V.ANJARIA, J)

(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) BIJOY B. PILLAI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter