Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 482 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/3625/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 3625 of
2023
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 409 of 2023
With
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 409 of 2023
==========================================================
JENTIBHAI DEVABHAI VANKAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
DARSHIT R BRAHMBHATT(8011) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS MAITHILI MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER
Date : 18/01/2024
COMMON ORAL ORDER
ORDER IN CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION:
1. This is an application by the applicant - original
complainant under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, seeking leave of this Court to present an
appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated
29.07.2022 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Nadiad in Criminal Case No.3617 of 2016.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/3625/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024
undefined
2. Heard, Mr. Darshit R. Brahmbhatt, learned advocate
appearing for the applicant - original complainant and
perused the impugned judgment and order of the trial Court.
3. Learned advocate Mr. Darshit R. Brahmbhatt for the
applicant - original complainant submits that the judgment
and order of the acquittal was passed by the learned trial
Court only on the ground that the demand notice, which was
produced below Exh.30, is for three different cheques,
wherein, the complaint was filed for the dishonour of one
cheque. Learned advocate further submits that the demand
notice consisting of three different cheques, wherein, three
different amounts are mentioned at Page-2 of Exh.30 and the
disputed cheque, which was mentioned at Sr. No.1 being
Cheque No.422231 for the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and other
two cheques separate complaints came to be filed. Learned
advocate has drawn attention of this Court with regard to the
Exh.30 and submits that merely, the demand notice consisting
of three different cheques would not absolve the respondent -
accused from the liability of making payment of cheque and in
the circumstances, when the signature on the cheque and the
issuance of the cheque was not disputed by the respondent -
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/3625/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024
undefined
accused, the learned trial Court ought not to have acquitted
the respondent - accused on the said ground. Learned
advocate further submits that though the presumption, which
is in favour of the complainant under Section 118 and 139 of
the N.I. Act, was not rebutted, the learned trial Court had
committed grave error in acquitting the respondent - accused
and therefore, prays to grant the application seeking leave to
prefer an appeal.
4. Considering the avernments made in the application and
submissions made by the learned advocate, this Court finds
that there is some arguable case in favour of the applicant,
therefore, leave, as prayed for, is granted. This application is
allowed.
ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPEAL:
1. The appeal is admitted. Learned APP waives service of
notice of admission on behalf of respondent no.1 - State and
Mr. Alinavaz A. Vakil, learned advocate waives service of
notice of admission on behalf of respondent no.2 - accused.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/3625/2023 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2024
undefined
2. Record and proceedings be called for from the
concerned court. Registry is directed to list the Criminal
Appeal in seriatim.
(M. K. THAKKER,J) A. B. VAGHELA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!