Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1511 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3287/2022 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 3287 of 2022
In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 27268 of 2019
With
F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 27268 of 2019
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4869 of 2019
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2019
In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 27268 of 2019
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4869 of 2019
With
F/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 27272 of 2019
In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 27268 of 2019
==========================================================
SATISHCHANDRA DHIRAJSINH SOLANKISATISHCHANDRA DHIRAJSINH SOLANKI & ORS.
Versus
JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER & ORS.JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. ASHOK A PUROHIT(6267) for Applicant(s) No. 1,1.1,1.2
for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3
MR SALIL M THAKORE(5821) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 19/02/2024
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. This is a wholly misconceived application
seeking for leave to appeal by a person who has
already approached the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal
seeking to challenge the order passed by the Charity
Commissioner which was subjected to challenge by
other private persons before the learned Single Judge
and who had lost before the Single Bench.
2. It is an admitted fact of the matter that the
applicant herein has filed Revision No.2 of 2019
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3287/2022 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2024
undefined
before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal challenging the
order dated 27.12.2018 passed by the Joint Charity
Commissioner, which is pending consideration as on
date. The contention of the learned counsel for the
applicant that the observations made in the judgment
and order dated 05.04.2019 passed by the learned
Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.4869 of
2019 connected with other petitions filed by some
other persons would be affecting the applicant in an
adverse manner, is found misconceived.
3. No leave can be granted to the applicant to
institute appeal in view of the pendency of the
proceedings before the Tribunal wherein the applicant
is free to agitate his claims and rights available in
law. The application seeking leave to appeal is,
accordingly, rejected. In view of the rejection of
the application seeking leave to appeal, other
applications and appeal automatically stand rejected.
(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ )
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J) GAURAV J THAKER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!