Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pankajbhai Harshadbhai Parekh vs State Of Gujarat
2023 Latest Caselaw 4338 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4338 Guj
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Pankajbhai Harshadbhai Parekh vs State Of Gujarat on 12 June, 2023
Bench: Sandeep N. Bhatt
     R/SCR.A/4888/2020                               ORDER DATED: 12/06/2023




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

           R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4888 of 2020

==========================================================
                         PANKAJBHAI HARSHADBHAI PAREKH
                                     Versus
                               STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RAJEN R DELIWALA(2266) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
SHYAMAL K BHIMANI(8233) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR. DIVYANG A RAMANI(7180) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR. DHAVAN JAISWAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

                                 Date : 12/06/2023
                                  ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed for seeking following reliefs:-

"(A) Admit and allow the present petition;

(B) Quash and set aside the impugned order and judgment

dated 08.09.2020 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Rajkot at Dhoraji, in Criminal Revision Application 3

and 5 of 2020;

(C) Quash and set aside the impugned order and judgment

dated 29.05.2020 passed by the Learned Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate Court, Dhoraji in Criminal Miscellaneous

Application No. 116 of 2018;

(D) Pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of the

R/SCR.A/4888/2020 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2023

captioned Petition, be pleased to stay the implementation,

execution and operation of impugned order and judgment

dated 08.09.2020 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Rajkot at Dhoraji, in Criminal Revision Application 3

and 5 of 2020;

(E) Pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of the

captioned Petition, be pleased to stay the execution

proceedings pending before the Ld. Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate Court, Dhoraji bearing No. CRMA J No. 46 /

2020 and CRMA J No. 80/2020;

(F) Call for the original records and proceedings of the

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 116 of 2018

preferred before the Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

Court, Dhoraji;

(G) Issue ex parte ad interim relief in terms of paragraph

no. 10 (D) and (E), above;

(H) Grant any such other and/or further order/s that this

Hon'ble Court may deem fit and propoer in the facts and

circumstances of the case."

2. When the matter is called out, learned advocate Mr.

Shyamal Bhimani for the petitioner has submitted that

during the pendency of the proceeding, parties have

arrived at settlement whereby the petitioner, who is

R/SCR.A/4888/2020 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2023

husband is required to pay Rs.25 lakhs towards full and

final settlement. Out of this, the petitioner has already

paid Rs.5 lakhs till today. Rest of the amount is

required to be paid as per the scheduled prescribed in

terms of agreement for settlement.

3. The agreement for settlement is already placed on

record, which is also notarized and is part of this

petition and the same is taken on record.

4. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed

by granting relief in terms of para 10(B) & (C) of this

petition by quashing and setting aside the respective

judgments passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Rajkot at Dhoraji and in Criminal Revision Application

No.3 & 5 of 2020 and learned Addl. Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Dhoraji in Criminal Misc. Application No.116

of 2018.

5. This application is allowed in view of settlement by

granting abovementioned relief in terms para 10(B) &

(C).

R/SCR.A/4888/2020 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2023

6. It is clarified that if any terms of settlement is not

complied with, it will be open for the respondent to

make necessary request for reviving the criminal

proceedings.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) DIWAKAR SHUKLA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter