Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shantaben Kirtanbhai Pagi Thakor vs Mukeshbhai Kalubhai Rathod
2023 Latest Caselaw 4096 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4096 Guj
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Shantaben Kirtanbhai Pagi Thakor vs Mukeshbhai Kalubhai Rathod on 6 June, 2023
Bench: Gita Gopi
     C/FA/1292/2023                                 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1292 of 2023

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE :

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

================================================================

1    Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see                    No
     the judgment ?

2    To be referred to the Reporter or not ?                                    No

3    Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the                   No
     judgment ?

No4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law                    No
    as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any
    order made thereunder ?

================================================================
                      SHANTABEN KIRTANBHAI PAGI THAKOR
                                   Versus
                        MUKESHBHAI KALUBHAI RATHOD
================================================================
Appearance:
NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5
for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
================================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

                                Date : 06/06/2023

                               ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Since the issue has been raised in a very narrow compass, with consent of learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties, this Appeal is taken up for final hearing today.

C/FA/1292/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023

2. By way of this Appeal, the Appellants-claimants have challenged the judgment and award dated 23.07.2019 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Kheda at Nadiad in M.A.C.P. No.1658 of 2010. The claimants are the aged mother, widow and two children of the deceased.

3. The only issue that has been raised is that the learned Tribunal has granted vide the above judgment and award only Rs.40,000/- under the head of loss of consortium.

4. The facts of the case in a nutshell is that on 22.08.2010 the deceased Kirtan Lakhabhai Thakor was plying the motorcycle bearing Registration No.GJ-1- JE-7825 in moderate speed and on the correct side of the road. When the deceased reached near the place of accident, at that point of time, the respondent No.1 came driving the Truck bearing Registration No.GJ-18-T-9721 in excessive speed and in a rash and negligent manner and dashed the truck with the above Motorcycle from the rear side, as a result of which, the deceased suffered serious injuries on

C/FA/1292/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023

various parts of the body and ultimately succumbed because of the injuries so received.

5. Learned Advocate for the appellants Mr. Nishit A. Bhalodi submits that the claimants were four in number at the time of the delivery of the judgment and award. It is submitted that the learned Tribunal ought to have taken into consideration the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram reported in 2018 ACJ 2782 where the consortium amount is determined to be granted to the claimants.

6. Learned Advocate for the respondent - Insurance Company Mr. Rathin P. Raval submits the learned Tribunal has granted an amount of Rs.40,000/- under the head of loss of consortium, which is just and reasonable.

7. The learned Tribunal vide its judgment and award after considering the evidence on record has granted the compensation under the following heads :-

C/FA/1292/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023

Future loss of Dependency Rs.8,06,400/-

   Consortium                                   Rs.40,000/-
   Loss of Estate                               Rs.15,000/-
   Funeral Expenses                             Rs.15,000/-
         Total Compensation                 Rs.8,76,400/-


8. Here the claimants are the aged mother, widow and two children of the deceased. Only an amount of Rs.40,000/- has been granted under the head of consortium loss. The rest of the claimants are also entitled under the above head. Hence, considering Rs.40,000/- for each individual, an amount of Rs.1,20,000/- for rest of the claimants (3 claimants x Rs.40,000/- each) is required to be granted under the head of loss of consortium.

9. As per the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd, the consortium amount is to be granted. Relevant paragraphs of this decision are reproduced hereunder :-

"8.7 A Constitution Bench of this Court in Pranay Sethi (supra) dealt with the various heads under which compensation is to be awarded in a death case. One of these heads is Loss of Consortium. In

C/FA/1292/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023

legal parlance, "consortium" is a compendious term which encompasses 'spousal consortium', 'parental consortium', and 'filial consortium'. The right to consortium would include the company, care, help, comfort, guidance, solace and affection of the deceased, which is a loss to his family. With respect to a spouse, it would include sexual relations with the deceased spouse. Spousal consortium is generally defined as rights pertaining to the relationship of a husband− wife which allows compensation to the surviving spouse for loss of "company, society, co− operation, affection, and aid of the other in every conjugal relation." Parental consortium is granted to the child upon the premature death of a parent, for loss of "parental aid, protection, affection, society, discipline, guidance and training." Filial consortium is the right of the parents to compensation in the case of an accidental death of a child. An accident leading to the death of a child causes great shock and agony to the parents and 3 Rajesh and Ors. vs. Rajbir Singh and Ors. (2013) 9 SCC 54 4 BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY (5th ed. 1979) family of the deceased. The greatest agony for a parent is to lose their child during their lifetime. Children are valued for their love, affection, companionship and their role in the family unit.

Consortium is a special prism reflecting changing norms about the status and worth of actual relationships. Modern jurisdictions world−over have recognized that the value of a child's consortium far exceeds the economic value of the compensation

C/FA/1292/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023

awarded in the case of the death of a child. Most jurisdictions therefore permit parents to be awarded compensation under loss of consortium on the death of a child. The amount awarded to the parents is a compensation for loss of the love, affection, care and companionship of the deceased child.

The Motor Vehicles Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at providing relief to the victims or their families, in cases of genuine claims. In case where a parent has lost their minor child, or unmarried son or daughter, the parents are entitled to be awarded loss of consortium under the head of Filial Consortium.

Parental Consortium is awarded to children who lose their parents in motor vehicle accidents under the Act."

10. The learned Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs.8,76,400/- with rate of interest @ 9% per annum, which the respondents are liable to deposit, with the enhanced / additional amount as Rs.1,20,000 (Rs.9,96,400/- minus Rs.8,76,400/-). In the result, the present respondents are directed to deposit the above / enhanced amount within a period of SIX (6) WEEKS from the date of receipt of writ of the order of this Court. It is further directed that the claimants would be entitled to receive the enhanced compensation @ 7.5% per annum from the date of

C/FA/1292/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/06/2023

the application and the disbursement of the amount be made as per the judgment and award of the learned Tribunal.

11. In view of the above, the Appeal is allowed and the judgment and award dated 23.07.2019 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Kheda at Nadiad in M.A.C.P. No.1658 of 2010 stands modified to the above extent. Record and proceedings, if any, be sent back to the concerned Court / Tribunal forthwith.

Sd/-

(GITA GOPI, J) CAROLINE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter