Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 66 Guj
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2023
C/SCA/8923/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/01/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8923 of 2022
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
CRUST MINE-CHEM PVT. LTD.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAV R MISHRA(6140) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR.ROHAN SHAH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 3,4,5
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 03/01/2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.Rohan Shah
learned AGP waives service of notice of Rule on
behalf of the respondent State.
C/SCA/8923/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/01/2023
2. With the consent of learned advocates for the
respective parties, the petition is taken up for
final hearing.
3. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the challenge is to the
order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the Collector.
It is the case of the petitioner that the Collector
ought to have considered the case of the
petitioner that 'saved case'. Against the order of
the Collector, a Revision Application has been
filed by the petitioner before the respondent
State bearing No.R652. It is the case of the
petitioner that as evident from the order passed
by this Court in Special Civil Application
No.15078 of 2022, the Revisional Authority be
directed to consider the petitioner's case
whether it would fall within 'a saved case' while
deciding the Revision Application.
C/SCA/8923/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/01/2023
4. Accordingly, the petition is partly allowed. The
Revisional Authority is directed to decide the
Revision Application pending before within 8
weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this
order. While deciding the Revision Application
the Revisional Authority shall give a specific
finding as to whether the case of the petitioner
can be considered under 'saved case' or not.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is
made absolute accordingly. Direct service is
permitted.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) ANKIT SHAH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!