Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7468 Guj
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2022
C/SCA/16572/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 29/08/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16572 of 2022
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
==========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India or any order made thereunder ?
==========================================================
DINESHBHAI NATHABHAI RAMANI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MUKESH T MISHRA(5900) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR SOAHAM JOSHI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 29/08/2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Heard. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Soaham Joshi,
learned AGP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of
C/SCA/16572/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 29/08/2022
respondent State.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as a
daily wager in the year 1992 and worked continuously up to
1994. On termination of his service in the year 1994, he raised
an industrial dispute. A reference being Reference (LCR) No.
178 of 2005 referred to the Labour Court was adjudicated
inasmuch as by an award dated 16.09.2011, the petitioner was
directed to be reinstated without continuity of service and
without back-wages. The petitioner filed Special Civil
Application No. 7511 of 2013 for compliance of award and
pursuant to the order dated 04.12.2013 passed therein, the
petitioner was reinstated.
3. Mr. M.T. Mishra, learned advocate appearing for the
petitioner would submit that pursuant to his reinstatement
having completed requisite number of years of service, he is
entitled to the benefit of the resolution dated 17.10.1988 read
C/SCA/16572/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 29/08/2022
with Government Resolution dated 30.05.1989.
4. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the
petitioner on the basis of the Government Resolution dated
17.10.1988 read with the Government Resolution dated
30.05.1989 and also keeping in mind the award of the Labour
Court in question within a period of ten weeks from the date of
receipt of the writ of the order of this court.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is made
absolute accordingly. Direct service is permitted.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) VATSAL S. KOTECHA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!