Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4007 Guj
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2022
R/CR.MA/249/2022 ORDER DATED: 05/04/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 249 of 2022
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 23 of 2022
==========================================================
MAHESH @ MAYALO JITUBHAI @ KAKA SOLANKI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. YOGENDRA THAKORE(3975) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR HARDIK SONI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 05/04/2022
ORAL ORDER
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for
and on behalf of the respondent - State.
By way of this application, the applicant has prayed for
condonation of delay of 1354 days caused in preferring
Criminal Appeal No.23 of 2022.
Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a
delay of 1354 days in preferring the main Criminal Appeal
No.23 of 2022 before this Court. The said delay was neither
intentional nor deliberate nor due to negligence on the part of
R/CR.MA/249/2022 ORDER DATED: 05/04/2022
any concerned person/persons, but has occurred in
complying with the procedural formalities in the matter.
Learned APP for the respondent-State has raised
objection and requested to dismiss present application.
Having gone through the averments made in this
application as well as those made out before this Court, it
appears that co-accused viz. Vijay Rajeshbhai @ Rudi Parmar
has preferred Criminal Appeal No.1532 of 2016 against the
same judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned
Trial Court which has been admitted by this Court and is
pending for final hearing. Further, it appears that co-accused
viz. Vijay Rajeshbhai @ Rudi Parmar was granted bail under
Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 vide
order dated 10.10.2018 in Criminal Misc. Application No.9 of
2018 in Criminal Appeal No.1532 of 2016. For the reasons
stated by learned advocate for the applicant as he received the
copy of the judgment and it was misplaced, then he contacted
the High Court Legal Service Committee and procedure to
engage an advocate and prepare the drafting has taken time,
prayer made by the present applicant to condone the delay
requires consideration and delay of 1354 days which had
occurred in filing the main Criminal Appeal No.23 of 2022
R/CR.MA/249/2022 ORDER DATED: 05/04/2022
appears to have been sufficiently explained.
Accordingly, the delay occurred in preferring the main
Criminal Appeal No.23 of 2022 is hereby condoned.
Criminal Misc. Application stands allowed and
accordingly disposed of. Rule nisi made absolute to the
aforesaid extent.
(B.N. KARIA, J) rakesh/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!