Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6891 Gua
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010051622025
2025:GAU-AS:11769
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1345/2025
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW ASSURANCE BUILDING 87, MG
ROAD, MUMBAI, AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT STAR CITY
COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, GUWAHATI-781007, NEAR
HANUMAN MANDIR AND ONE OF ITS DIVISIONAL OFFICE AT
BONGAIGAON.
VERSUS
KABOM PERTIN
S/O- DHORMESWAR PERTIN
2:PILU PERTIN
D/O. KABOM PERTIN AND LT. AMPING MEGU PERTIN.
3:PIKOLI PERTIN
D/O. KABOM PERTIN AND LT. AMPING MEGU PERTIN
4:MIDO PERTIN
S/O. KABOM PERTIN AND LT. AMPING MEGU PERTIN
5:PINGKU PERTIN
D/O. KABOM PERTIN AND LT. AMPING MEGU PERTIN
ALL ARE PERMANENT RESIDENT OF R/O- NEW BORGULI VILL
P/O. MEBO
P/S. PASIGHAT
EAST SIANG
ARUNACHAL PRADESH-791104
PRESENT ADDRESS- BONGAIGAON
W/NO. 25
SALBARI
P/O. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM
PIN-783380.
6:AFTAB KHAN
S/O. ANAMUL KHAN
R/O. VILL.- PASIGHAT BAZAR
PASIGHAT JAIL ROAD
P/O. AND P/S. PASIGHAT
EAST SIANG
DIST. ARUNACHAL PRADESH-791102.
7:MIRAJ KHAN
S/O. ANAMUL KHAN
R/O. GAURA BAZAR
PAITHAN TOLA VILLAGE
P/O. GAURA
P/S. KATYA
DIST. GOPALGANJ
BIHAR
PIN-841437.
PRESENT ADDRESS
VILL.- PASIGHAT BAZAR
PASIGHAT JAIL ROAD
P/O. AND P/S. PASIGHAT
EAST SIANG DIST. ARUNACHAL PRADESH-791102
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R K BHATRA, A BIYANI,MR. A SAIKIA,MS P HUJURI,L A
MAGAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M KHAN (R-1 TO 5), MS CHITRALEKHA DAS (R-6,7),MR.
K R PATGIRI (R-6,7),MS. D. DEVI (R-6,7),MS J AKTAR(R-1 TO 5),MR A K DAS(R-1 TO 5)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
Date : 01-09-2025
Heard learned counsel Ms. S. Choudhury on behalf of learned counsel Mr. R.K. Bhatra for the applicant/appellant.
2. This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with Page No.# 3/3
prayer for condonation of delay of 29 (Twenty Nine) days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 04.10.2024 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Bongaigaon in MAC Case No. 188/2021.
3. Learned counsel Mr. M. Khan representing the respondents No. 1 to 5 has submitted that there is no scope of settlement and the matter may not be referred to mediation. However, he has not raised objection against the prayer for condonation of delay.
4. Learned counsel Mr. K.R. Patgiri for the respondents No. 6 and 7 has no objection if the delay is condoned.
5. It appears that there is no malafide on the part of the applicant and sufficient grounds have been shown. The delay was owing to the information forwarded to the Regional Office.
6. Considering all aspects, the delay of 29 (Twenty Nine) days is hereby condoned.
7. Registry to register the connected appeal and to reflect that name of Mr. M. Khan and Mr. K.R. Patgiri as learned counsel, representing the respondents respectively, in the cause list.
8. In terms of the above observation, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!