Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1589 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010127722022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRL.A(J)/65/2022
KAMAL RAJBONGSHI
BAKSA, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA (Amicus Curiae),
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Linked Case : Crl.A./58/2022
KAMAL RAJBONGSHI
S/O SRI KRISHNA RAJBONGSHI
RESIDENT OF DAKHIN KHAYERBARI
PS SALBARI
DIST BAKSA
ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. N K KALITA
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
ORDER
30.07.2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
Mr. N.J. Dutta, learned Amicus Curiae submits that he has been engaged for the appellant in Criminal Appeal(J) 65/2022.
Mr. N.K. Kalita, learned counsel for the same appellant submits that Criminal Appeal 58/2022 had been filed by the appellant and as such, there are two criminal appeals filed by the appellant, one from Jail and one through him. However, the file pertaining to the appeal filed by the appellant through him has been taken back by the appellant and as such, he would not be appearing for the appellant any longer.
On perusal of Criminal Appeal(J) 65/2022 and Criminal Appeal 58/2022, we find that the same appellant has filed two different appeals against the same impugned judgment and order dated 22.12.2021 passed by the Special Court, Baksa, Mushalpur in Special POCSO Case no.28/2020, arising out of Salbari P.S. Case No.76/2020 under Section 498(A) IPA read with Section 4 of POCSO Act.
We find that the appellant has challenged his conviction by the Special Court in the above matter under Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act, whereby he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 (twenty) years with a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of fine to suffer simple imprisonment for 6 (six) months.
We also find that the Paper Book has been prepared. As the issue to be Page No.# 3/3
decided can be decided only in one appeal, we are of the view that Criminal Appeal 58/2022 should be closed and the challenge to the impugned judgment and order dated 22.12.2021 passed in Special POCSO Case no.28/2020 could be decided in Criminal Appeal(J) 65/2022. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal 58/2022 stands closed.
We also find that no Notice has been issued to the victim or the guardian of the victim in both the appeals filed by the same appellant. Accordingly, in terms of the order passed in Criminal Appeal(J) 65/2022, we issue Notice to the mother/guardian of the victim, to be served through the P.P's office and the O.C. of the concerned police station.
Registry to provide a copy of this order along with the appeal petition to the office of the P.P, Assam, who shall thereafter forward the same to the O.C. of the concerned police station for taking steps for service of notice.
List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!