Jamal Uddin vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 1372 Gua

Gauhati High Court

Jamal Uddin vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 22 July, 2025

Author: K.R. Surana

Bench: Kalyan Rai Surana

                                                                   Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010192802017




                                                            undefined

                          THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                            Case No. : WP(C)/696/2017

         JAMAL UDDIN
         S/O. JOHUR @ JOHUR UDDIN, VILL. SAHARIAPAM, P.S. MOIRABARI, DIST.
         MORIGAON, ASSAM.



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS
         TO BE REP. BY SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, HOME DEPTT., NORTH
         BLOCK, NEW DELHI.

         2:STATE OF ASSAM

          TO BE REP. BY COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          HOME DEPTT.
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI- 06.

         3:ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
         ASSAM BORDER

          BHANGAGARH
          GUWAHATI- 05.

         4:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

          MORIGAON
          ASSAM.

         5:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BORDER

          MORIGAON
          ASSAM
                                                                       Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR.N H MAZARBHUYAN, MR.K MIRA,MR.N ISLAM,MS.L
WAJEEDA

Advocate for the Respondent : , ASSTT.S.G.I.,GA, ASSAM




                                  BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
               HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

                                         ORDER

Date : 22.07.2025 (K.R. Surana, J)

Heard Ms. L. Wajeeda, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Deka, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the FT matters and NRC; Mr. H. Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the ECI; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondent.

Argument is concluded.

Judgment reserved.

                                      JUDGE               JUDGE



Comparing Assistant