Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1142 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2025
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010153122025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3970/2025
ASAB UDDIN
S/O LATE AZIZUR RAHMAN, R/O VILL- KURTI, P.O.- KATHALTALI, DIST-
SRIBHUMI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM,
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JURIPAR
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SRIBHUMI
P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
PIN-788710
4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CHANDKHIRA ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
PIN-788710
5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
LOAIRPORA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
P.O.- BAZARICHERRA
Page No.# 2/3
DIST- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
PIN-788728
6:THE SECRETARY
NO. 8 KUKITAL GAON PANCHAYAT
P.O.- KATHALTALI
DIST- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
7:BAHAR UDDIN
S/O LATE ABDUL NOOR
R/O VILL- KURTI
P.O.- KATHALTALI
P.S.- BAZARICHERRA
DIST- SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
PIN-78872
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY, MR. S R BARBHUIYA,MR M
HUSSAIN,MR. A K AZAD,MR. N HAQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
19.07.2025
Heard Shri P.K.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner.
As per the facts projected, the petitioner is a voter of Ward No. 8 of No. 8 Kukital Gaon Panchayat in the district of Sribhumi.
The grievance of the petitioner is the election of the respondent no. 7 who according to him is disqualified.
The petitioner has also annexed a judgment of this Court wherein there has been a disclosure of the respondent no. 7 having 10 nos. of children Page No.# 3/3
through two wives. The petitioner has submitted representations which however have not been looked into.
Shri N. Das, learned State Counsel as well as Ms. P. Thapa, learned counsel appearing on instruction of the S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel P&RD have however raised the objection of locus by submitting that no legal prejudice has been able to be made out by the election of the respondent no. 7.
Let notice be issued, returnable by 6 (six) weeks.
Ms. Thapa, the learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 whereas Shri N. Das, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no.3
Extra copies of the writ petition be served upon the learned counsel for the respondents within 2 (two) working days from today.
Steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4 to be taken by registered post with A/D within 2 (two) working days from today.
The issue of the maintainability of the writ petition on the aspect of locus as well as the relief prayed for is however kept open.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!