Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 2522 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2522 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2025

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 30 January, 2025

                                                                       Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010009782025




                                                                 2025:GAU-AS:1056

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/71/2025

            SAJEN SABOR
            S/O PABITRA SABAR,
            RESIDENT OF BOALI TEA ESTATE, PS LAKHIPUR, DIST CACHAR, SILCHAR
            ASSAM



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
            REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM

            2:MINA SABOR
            W/O KUMUD SABOR

            RESIDENT OF BOALI TEA ESTATE
            PS LAKHIPUR
            DIST CACHAR
            SILCHAR ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S BISWAS,

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,




                                  BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

                                           ORDER

30.01.2025.

Heard Mr. S. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P. Page No.# 2/2

Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 5 days in preferring the connected appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 05.11.2024 passed by the learned Court of Special Judge (POCSO), Cachar, Silchar in Special (P) Case No. 113/2023. The cause of delay is explained at paragraphs- 3 and 4 of the connected application.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that that they will have no objection, if delay is condoned.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents as well as the pleadings made in the paragraphs 3 and 4 of the connected application, this Court is of the opinion that the present applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the connected appeal within time.

Accordingly, the delay is condoned.

IA stands disposed of.

Registry to register the connected appeal, if same is not defective and list for Admission.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter