Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4510 Gua
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2023
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010227872023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6371/2023
EX NO. E/380429Y HAV/ELECTRICIAN NITYANANDA MOHANTY AND 3
ORS
S/O- SH. DAMBUR DHARA MOHANTY,
RETIRED FROM SERVICE AS HAVILDAR/ ELECTRICIAN FROM HEAD
QUARTER 22 SECTOR, ASSAM RIFLES, C/O- 99 APO.
2: EX NO. S/356377
HAV/ORL SHIV JANAM SINGH
S/O- LATE BELI RAM
RETIRED FROM SERVICE AS HAV/ORL FROM 27TH ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO
PIN- 932027.
3: EX NO. C/361555
WARRANT OFFICER/CLERK RAMESH KUMAR
S/O- JAGAT RAM
RETIRED FROM SERVICE AS WARRANT OFFICER/CLERK FROM 18TH
ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO
PIN- 932018.
4: EX NO. G/3200139K HAV/GD WANGLAK WANGPAN
S/O- LATE AIPIA WANGPAN
RETIRED FROM SERVICE AS HAVILDAR/GD FROM 43RD ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO
PIN- 932043
VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3
UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI- 110001.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES
HEAD QUARTER MAHANIDESHALAYA ASSAM RIFLES
SHILLONG
MEGHALAYA
PIN- 973011.
3:THE COMMANDAR
HEAD QUARTER
22 SECTOR
ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO.
4:THE COMMANDANT
27 ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO
PIN- 932002.
5:THE COMMANDANT
18TH ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO
PIN- 932018.
6:THE COMMANDANT
43RD ASSAM RIFLES
C/O- 99 APO
PIN- 932043
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR V KUMAR
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 06.11.2023
Heard Mr. B. Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R. Devi, learned Page No.# 3/3
counsel for the respondents.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 06.09.2021 and 08.11.2021 by which the respondents authorities took a decision to cancel all retirement orders which was earlier issued on medical ground. It is submitted that pursuant to this policy decision, no further communication has been issued. If that be so, the petitioner is required to be reinstated back in service. This issue has been decided by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 1421/2017 and other connected writ petitions by Judgment and order dated 12.02.2021 by which order the termination order was interfered with and set aside. An intra-Court appeal filed against the said Judgment and order has also been dismissed. The SLP preferred by the Union has also been dismissed.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this issue arises in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the said Judgment and order dated 12.02.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1421/2017 and other connected writ petitions. He therefore submits that the prayers made in the writ petition be allowed.
Ms. R. Devi, learned counsel submits that she does not have instructions and prays for time to obtain the required instructions.
Accordingly, let Notice be issued, Returnable in four weeks.
Since the learned counsel has entered appearance, notices are waived. However, extra copies be furnished within three working days from today.
Meanwhile the respondents will obtain required instructions as to the grounds on which the petitioner has been directed to proceed on retirement.
List after four weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!