Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3978 Gua
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2022
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010160922019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MACApp./740/2022
THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT 3, MIDDLETON STREET, CALCUTTA-
700071, REP. BY THE MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE,
BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI- 781005.
VERSUS
SMTI. RUPALI CHETRY AND 5 ORS.
W/O- LATE GANESH CHETRY
2:SMTI. HEMANTI MAYA CHETRY
D/O- LATE GANESH CHETRY
3:SHRI CHANDRA CHETRY
S/O- LATE GANESH CHETRY
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF LIKABALI GREF CAMP NO. 519
P.S. AND P.O. SILAPATHAR
DIST.- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN- 787059. (OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 2 AND 3 ARE REP. BY OPPOSITE PARTY
NO. 1).
4:SRI DILIP GOHAIN
S/O- SHRI PREMADHAR GOHAIN
R/O- WARD NO. 3
ARADHAL
P.O. ARADHAL
P.S. AND DIST.- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN- 787057. (OWNER AND DRIVER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-22-B-2435).
5:SRI KARNA BAHADUR CHETRY
Page No.# 2/3
S/O- LATE MONBAHADUR CHETRY
R/O- VILL.- TULSIBARI
P.O.
P.S. AND DIST.- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN- 787001. (OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-22-D-0229).
6:SMTI. BISNUMAYA CHETRY
W/O- SHRI HEM BAHADUR CHETRY
R/O- VILL. AND P.O. KOBU CHAPORI
P.S. JONAI
DIST.- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
PIN- 787060
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R D MOZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. T GOGOI
BEFORE
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
ORDER
30.09.2022 Heard Ms R D Mozumdar, learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company and Mr T Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
The appellant/Insurance Company has preferred the appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 17.11.2018, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Dhemaji, in MAC Case No. 03/2015.
The appeal is admitted.
As the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 has entered his appearance, no formal notice is necessary.
However, requisite extra copies of the petition be furnished to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
Issue notice upon respondent No. 6, by registered post with A/D as well as by Page No.# 3/3
usual process, returnable within 4 (four) weeks.
Steps be taken within a week from today.
Regarding the respondent Nos. 4 and 5, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are the driver and owner of the offending vehicle, respectively, and as they have preferred the appeal only on the quantum of compensation, so their presence is not necessary in the proceeding and as such, she has prayed that the names of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 be struck off from the array of respondents.
Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, let the names of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 be struck off from the array of respondents in the Cause Title of the appeal, at the risk of the appellant.
Registry is directed to do the needful, in this regard.
Call for the LCR.
List the matter accordingly, after 4 (four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!