Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/5 vs Bhanu Nessa
2022 Latest Caselaw 3846 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3846 Gua
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Page No.# 1/5 vs Bhanu Nessa on 27 September, 2022
                                                         Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010090652022




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                               Case No. : CRP/22/2022

         MUST. SAKITAN NESSA AND 4 ORS.
         W/O- LATE HANIF ALI
         VILL.- SOILMARI
         P.O. CHIKNI
         MOUZA- TITAPANI
         P.S. KALGACHIA
         DIST. BARPETA
         ASSAM

         2: MUST. SAHERA KHATUN
         D/O- LATE HANIF ALI
         W/O- ABDUR REJJAK
         VILL.- UJIRER CHAR
          P.O. AND P.S. BAGHBAR
          DIST. BARPETA
         ASSAM

         3: MUST. HASINA KHATUN
         D/O- LATE HANIF ALI
         W/O- SAYED ALI
         VILL.- SARAGAON
         P.O. JAIPUR
         P.S. AMGURI
         DIST. CHIRANG
         ASSAM

         4: SHAHIDUL ISLAM
         S/O- LATE HANIF ALI
         VILL.- SOILMARI
         P.O. CHIKNI
         MOUZA- TITAPANI
         P.S. KALGACHIA
         DIST. BARPETA
         ASSAM
                                                                          Page No.# 2/5


           5: MAFIDUL ISLAM
           S/O- LATE HANIF ALI
           VILL.- SOILMARI
           P.O. CHIKNI
           MOUZA- TITAPANI
           P.S. KALGACHIA
           DIST. BARPETA
           ASSAM
           VERSUS

           BHANU NESSA
           W/O- SORHAB ALI
           D/O- LATE TAMEJ ALI
           VILL.- SOILMARI
           P.O. CHIKNI
           MOUZA- TITAPANI
           P.S. KALGACHIA
           DIST- BARPETA
           ASSAM
           PIN- 781321.


           ------------
           Advocate for : MR M H AHMED
           Advocate for : MR. J AHMED appearing for BHANU NESSA



                                   BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

                                      ORDER

Date : 27.09.2022

Heard Mr. M. H. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. J. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent.

This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 03.03.2022 passed in Misc. (J) Case No.30/2022 arising out of Misc. Appeal No.6/2022.

The case of the Petitioners in brief is that the Petitioners initially filed an Page No.# 3/5

application under Order XXI Rule 97, 99 & 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Title Execution Case No.41/2017. The said case was registered and numbered as Misc.(J) Case No.222/2021. The learned Munsiff No.1, Barpeta vide an order dated 15.02.2022 dismissed the petition holding inter alia that the judgment and decree passed in Title Suit No.85/2003 was also binding upon the Petitioners.

Being aggrieved and dissatisfied, the Petitioners as Appellants had prepared an appeal before the Court of the Civil Judge, Barpeta at Barpeta which was registered and numbered as Misc. Appeal No.6/2022. It may be relevant herein to mention that by virtue of Order XXI Rule 103, the order dated 15.02.2022 passed in Misc.(J) Case No.222/2021 would be deemed to be a decree. Along with the said appeal so filed, the Petitioners also filed an application for stay of the Title Execution Case No.41/2017 on the ground that if the said stay is not granted, the Petitioners who are in possession of the suit property would be dispossessed. The Court of the Civil Judge, Barpeta vide the order dated 03.03.2022 rejected the said petition seeking stay on the ground that the judgment passed in Title Suit No.85/2003 has already reached finality and there is no substantial loss likely to be caused to the Petitioners and as no undertaking required by law has been filed along with the petition, the said application was rejected. It is against the said order that the Petitioners have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

It is a well settled principle of law that pursuant to the amendment brought in the year 1976 to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Executing Court before whom an application is filed under Order XXI Rule 97, 99 and 101 is to determine all questions including the questions relating right, title and interest in the property and there is a bar of a separate suit by Rule 101 of Page No.# 4/5

Order XXI. Therefore, it would be seen that in terms with Order XXI Rule 103, the orders passed under Rule 98 and 100 are to be treated as decrees.

Considering the above, the appeal so filed by the Petitioners before the First Appellate Court i.e. the Court of the Civil Judge, Barpeta is a first appeal and along with the said first appeal, an application was filed for stay of the said execution proceedings taking into account that if the execution proceedings are permitted to go ahead pending disposal of the appeal, nothing would survive. However, it would be seen that the First Appellate Court basing its conclusions on the fact that the judgment passed in Title Suit No.85/2003 have already attained finality as it has been confirmed by this Court and did not take into consideration the necessary requirements while considering an application for stay. The First Appellate Court did not take into consideration that vide the impugned order dated 15.02.2022 the rights of the parties have already been decided as regards their right, title and interest over the suit property and the first appeal being a statutory right and the said appeal having been admitted, the Petitioners were entitled for protection of their possession till the disposal of the said appeal.

Considering the above, this Court deems it proper to direct that the parties shall maintain status quo as regards the possession in respect to the Schedule "X" and "Y" land as described in Misc. (J) Case No.222/2021 till the disposal of the appeal.

Taking into account that this Court has passed the above interim directions, this Court would request the Court of the Civil Judge, Barpeta to expeditiously dispose of the said appeal and preferably within 3 months from the date of appearance of the parties.

In view of the above order, the interim order dated 14.03.2022 stands Page No.# 5/5

vacated and the parties are directed to appear before the First Appellate Court i.e. the Court of the Civil Judge, Barpeta on 02.11.2022.

It is further observed that this Court is not staying the proceedings in Title Execution Case No.41/2017 and the decree holders would be at liberty to file appropriate applications for ascertaining the possession and measurement of the suit land in Title Suit No.85/2003 before the Executing Court. However, it is made clear that the status quo as regards the possession of Schedule "X" and "Y" land as described in Misc. (J) Case No.222/2021 be maintained till the disposal of the appeal before the First Appellate Court.

With above observations and directions, the instant petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter