Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3726 Gua
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2022
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010140072022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Review.Pet./146/2022
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT ICICI BANK
TOWERS, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, MUMBAI-400051 AND A BRANCH
OFFICE AT KAMAKHYA TOWER 3RD FLOOR, OFFICE NO. 305 AND 306, G.S.
ROAD, GUWAHATI-781005, ASSAM
VERSUS
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND 8 ORS. B
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 24 WHITES ROAD, CHENNAI AND
ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, BHANGAGARH,
GUWAHATI AND A DIVISIONAL OFFICE AT BONGAIGAON.
2:SMTI. BANDANA PATHAK
W/O- LATE SURESH PATHAK
R/O- VILL.- MAJKUCHI
PATBAUSHI
P.O. PATBAUSHI
P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
3:KUMAL PATHAK
D/O- LATE SURESH PATHAK
R/O- VILL.- MAJKUCHI
PATBAUSHI
P.O. PATBAUSHI
P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
4:KIRAN PATHAK
W/O- LATE KANDARPA PATHAK
R/O- VILL.- MAJKUCHI
PATBAUSHI
P.O. PATBAUSHI
Page No.# 2/3
P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
5:SEWALI PATHAK
D/O- LATE KANDARPA PATHAK
R/O- VILL.- MAJKUCHI
PATBAUSHI
P.O. PATBAUSHI
P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
6:DIGANTA DAS
S/O- SRI PRABIN CHANDRA DAS
R/O- VILL.- ATHIABARI
P.S. MASALPUR
DIST. BAKSA (BTAD)
ASSAM
7:M/S. SARGAM VENTURES PVT. LTD.
R/O- 2B
2ND FLOOR
ROYAL ARCADE II
DR. B. BARUAH ROAD
ULUBARI
DIST. KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN- 781007.
8:FIRDUS HUSSAIN
S/O- MD. HAMIDULLAH HUSSAIN
R/O- VILL.- KALMOWBARI
P.S. MIKIRBHETA
DIST. MORIGAON
ASSAM
9:NAYAN JYOTI BARMAN
R/O- H/NO. 20
PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATES NAGARBERA ROAD
SILPUKHURI
GUWAHATI
DIST. KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
PIN- 781003
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B J GHOSH
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 22.09.2022.
Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.
This review petition has been filed under Order 47 read with Section 151 of CPC praying for correction of the judgment and award dated 23.05.2022 passed by this Court in Mac Appeal No. 218/2017.
Here, the learned counsels have jointly agreed that the income tax was not deducted while calculating the compensation amount. Both the learned counsels submitted that the correction should be like this:-
Yearly Income - Rs.3,95,810/-
50% is added as future income - Rs.1,97,905/-
Deduct 1/4th for personal expenses - Rs. 1,48,428.75/-
Multiplier 15(Rs.4,45,286.25X15) - Rs. 66,79,293.75/-
Add funeral expenses loss of
consortium and loss of estate - Rs. 70,000/-
Total- 67,49,293.75/-
On being aggrieved by both sides, the revision petition is allowed. Now, the total compensation amount will be Rs.67,49,293.75/-. Both the insurance companies are to share the compensation amount of Rs. 67,49,293.75/-.
With the aforesaid direction, the review petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!