Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3646 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010123522022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4173/2022
BHADRA KANTA BORAH AND 7 ORS
SON OF MAHENDRA BORA, RESIDENT OF PANBARI FOREST, VILLAGE-
DIGBOI, P.O.- BHIMPATHAR, DISTRICT- TINSUKIA, ASSAM.
2: SMT. SANGITA SONOWAL
WIFE OF PAWAN SONOWAL
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHIMPATHAR
DIGBOI
P.O.- BHIMPATHAR
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
3: KOROBI SONOWAL
WIFE OF LOKHESWAR SONOWAL
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALGAON
DHEKIAJAN
P.O. DHEKIAJAN
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
4: SMT. UMA SHARMA
WIFE OF LATE PREM SHARMA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GOLAI NO. 1
P.O. GOLAI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
5: ROBERT SINGH
SON OF SHYAM SINGH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GOLAI NO. 1
P.O. GOLAI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/4
6: DAWA LAMA
SON OF UMANG LAMA
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GOLAI NO. 3
P.O. GOLAI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
7: SMT. SIMI DAS
WIFE OF PINTU DAS
RESIDENT OF HAWKINS PARA
STATION AREA
DIGBOI
P.O. DIGBOI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
8: SMT. MAMATA BEGUM
WIFE OF INAMUDDIN AHMED
RESIDENT OF STATION AREA
DIGBOI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6, ASSAM.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
TINSUKIA
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
3:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
MARGHERITA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK CUM EXECUTIVE OFFICER
MARGHERITA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT
MARGHERITA
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
4:THE SECRETARY
NO. 1 GOLAI GAON PANCHAYAT
DIGBOI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM.
Page No.# 3/4
5:THE PRESIDENT
NO. 1 GOLAI GAON PANCHAYAT
DIGBOI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM
PIN- 786171
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 19-09-2022 Heard Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned standing counsel, P&RD Department, Assam appearing for the official respondents.
It appears that in another writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No. 3240/2021 pertaining to the same controversy, an order of status quo was passed by the learned Single Judge and thereafter, the matter was finally heard and judgment reserved. According to the petitioner, due to the order of status quo passed in that proceeding, no further action is being taken by the authorities on the resolution adopted in the special meeting of the Gaon Panchayat expressing No-Confidence against the President. As such, a prayer has been made in this case for issuance of a direction.
However, since there is already an order of status quo passed by a coordinate bench, unless the said order is vacated, this Court cannot entertain the prayer made in this writ petition. Moreover, it is submitted at the bar that the other writ petition was heard on 02-02-2022 and since then, the judgment has been reserved.
Situated thus and on the request of learned counsel for both the sides, this matter is directed to be listed again after the Puja vacation so as to enable the petitioners' counsel to obtain updated instruction.
Page No.# 4/4
JUDGE GS
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!