Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5053 Gua
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010170582022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/166/2022
SADHAN DAS AND ANR
S/O LATE MAHANANDA DAS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND PO GAMARIA, PS RAMKRISHNA NAGAR,
DIST KARIMGANJ ,ASSAM
2: HIMANGSHU DAS
S/O LATE MAHANANDA DAS
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND PO GAMARIA
PS RAMKRISHNA NAGAR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSA
VERSUS
ON THE DEATH OF KRISHNANDA DAS HIS LEGAL HEIRS PRATIVA RANI
DAS AND ORS
W/O LATE KRISHNANDA DAS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKESH NAGAR, PO RAKESHNAGAR, PS
BADARPUR, DIST KARIMGANJ, ASSAM
2:KANU DAS
S/O LATE KRISHNANDA DAS
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKESH NAGAR
PO RAKESHNAGAR
PS BADARPUR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
3:ANIMA DAS
S/O LATE KRISHNANDA DAS
Page No.# 2/4
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKESH NAGAR
PO RAKESHNAGAR
PS BADARPUR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
4:KISHORE DAS
S/O LATE KRISHNANDA DAS
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKESH NAGAR
PO RAKESHNAGAR
PS BADARPUR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
5:MONIKA DAS
D/O LATE KRISHNANDA DAS
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAKESH NAGAR
PO RAKESHNAGAR
PS BADARPUR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
6:ANANTA KUMAR DAS
S/O SRI JAGAT CHANDRA DAS
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND PO GAMARIA
PS RAMKRISHNA NAGAR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
7:THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE
RAMRISHNA NAGAR
PO AND PS RAMKRISHNA NAGAR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
8:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
RAMRISHNA NAGAR
PO AND PS RAMKRISHNA NAGAR
DIST KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
9:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 3/4
KARIMGANJ
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
19.12.2022
Heard the learned counsel Mr. S.P.Choudhury, appearing for the appellants.
The appeal is admitted for hearing on the following three substantial questions of law:-
1. Whether the learned courts below have misconstrued the provision of Section 91 of the Evidence Act and thereby have arrived at an erroneous finding?
2. Whether the learned courts below mis-interpreted the provision of Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 so far as the Ext. 5 i.e., Deed of amicable family partition is concerned thereby arrived at an erroneous finding?
3. Whether the learned courts below failed to take into account the provision of Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 so far as the preferential right of the appellants over the suit land and as such the impugned judgment and decree of the learned courts below being perverse?
Issue notice to the respondents.
The appellants shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondents Page No.# 4/4
by registered post with A/D.
Call for the LCR.
List after 4(four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!