Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishna Kanta Das vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 2951 Gua

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2951 Gua
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2022

Gauhati High Court
Krishna Kanta Das vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 12 August, 2022
                                                                  Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010153382022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/5194/2022

            KRISHNA KANTA DAS
            S/O LT. GULESWAR DAS,
            VILL.- NO. 2 LAKHI PATHAR,
            P.O.- LAKHI PATHAR,
            P.S. AND DIST.- DHEMAJI, ASSAM.



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
            DEPTT. OF IRRIGATION.
            REP. BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE IRRIGATION DEPTT.

            2:CHIFT ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
             2ND BLOCK-B
             KRISHNA NAGAR
             CHANDMARI
             GUWAHATI
            ASSAM
             PIN- 781003.

            3:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN
             DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE DHEMAJI.

            4:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEVISION
             DHEMAJI AT DHEMAJI
             PIN- 787057

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S SAHU

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
                                                                                    Page No.# 2/3


                                    BEFORE
                  HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                           ORDER

12.08.2022 Heard Mr. S. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner's father died in harness on 31.05.2016, while working in the establishment of the respondent No. 4. The petitioner's grievance is that the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment has been rejected vide the District Level Committee (DLC) Meeting Minutes dated 29.4.2017 and 11.02.2022, on the ground that there was no vacancy available, as per the report of the respondent No. 4. He submits that the petitioner's application should have been considered in terms of paragraph No. 16 of the judgment of this Court in Taufique Rahman vs. State of Assam & Ors. and in terms of Clause 15 of the Office Memorandum dated 01.06.2015 also.

2. Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Ms. T.S. Neog, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 submit that they do not have any objection to the prayer made by the petitioner's counsel.

3. Paragraph No. 16 of the judgment of this Court in Taufique Rahman vs. State of Assam & Ors. and Clause 15 of the O.M dated 01.06.2015 are reproduced below:-

"16. In view of the above, it is directed that henceforth, all such DLCs and SLC in the State of Assam shall give a consideration not department and office wise, but taking the sum total of the total number of vacancies in all the departments and thereafter arrive at an inter-se financial comparison of all the applicants in respect of the departments and thereafter make the recommendation in the order of the applicants, who are financially worse off, subject of course to their suitability and their qualification for the given post. This order shall not be construed to be an order requiring the DLCs and the SLC to re-open the Page No.# 3/3

earlier cases, which were already considered and dealt with department wise as was done earlier."

"Clause - 15 of O.M dated 01.06.2015 If sufficient vacancies are not available in any particular office to accommodate the persons in the waiting list for compassionate appointment, it is open to the Administrative Department/Office to take up the matter with other Departments/Offices of the Government to provide at an early appointment on compassionate grounds to those in the waiting list."

4. In view of the consent of the parties, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner, in terms of para 16 of the judgment of this Court in Taufique Rahman (supra), read with Clause 15 of the O.M dated 01.06.2015. The case of the petitioner should accordingly be sent back to the concerned DLC for its consideration.

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter