Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunil Kumar vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi ) & ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 5666 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5666 Del
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2017

Delhi High Court
Sunil Kumar vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi ) & ... on 12 October, 2017
$~45
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    W.P.(CRL) 2872/2017
     SUNIL KUMAR                     ..... Petitioner
                            Through: Mr.Rajinder Juneja, Advocate along
                            with petitioner in person.

                            versus

         THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR.... Respondents
                       Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with SI
                       Gajender Singh, PS CWC, Malviya Nagar, Delhi.
                       Respondent no. 2 in person.

         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
                      ORDER

% 12.10.2017

1. Notice. Learned ASC, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice.

2. Notice to respondent no. 2 also. She appears in person and accepts notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Gajender Singh.

3. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.PC') for quashing of the FIR bearing No. 180/2016, registered against him on 05.10.2016 with Police Station CWC, Nanak Pura, District Special Police Unit for Women and Children, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2.

4. The marriage of the petitioner with the respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 28.11.2010 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies in Delhi.

Out of this wedlock, one male child namely Aryan Kumar was born on 25.11.2012.

5. After solemnization of their marriage, the petitioner and the respondent no.2 started residing together in the matrimonial home. After the birth of the child, due to some temperamental differences between the petitioner and the respondent no.2, they could not reconcile with each other. Resultantly, the respondent no.2 left the matrimonial home and started residing separately.

6. The mother of the respondent No.2 lodged a complaint against the petitioner before the CAW Cell which culminated into the said FIR. The respondent no. 2 preferred a petition under Section 125 of Cr.PC against the petitioner in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Tis Hazari, Delhi for maintenance against the petitioner.

7. The petitioner also preferred a petition bearing No. GS-10/2016 under Section 7 and 25 of the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 for custody of the child before learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala House Courts, Delhi.

8. On 20.03.2017, the parties had amicably resolved and settled all their disputes before the learned Principal Counsellor attached to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in the Guardianship petition bearing No. GS-10/2016. As per the settlement, the petitioner and the respondent no. 2 had decided to reside together peacefully. The petitioner had agreed to bear all household expenses including their child's education etc. It was further decided that both the parties shall withdraw their respective petitions filed against each other.

9. The respondent No.2 states that she had voluntarily settled and resolved her all disputes with the petitioner without any force and coercion.

10. The petitioner had withdrawn his petition under Section 7 & 25 of the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 on 22.05.2017 from the concerned court. The respondent no. 2 had also withdrawn her petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.PC from the concerned court.

11. The petitioner and the respondent no.2 submit that they have been residing together since April, 2017 and they do not have dispute or problem with each other. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not want to pursue the said FIR. She submits that the said FIR may be quashed.

12. Learned ASC through the IO submits that the charge sheet has so far not been filed.

13. Since the parties have amicably settled their all disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No. 180/2016, registered on 05.10.2016 with Police Station CWC, Nanak Pura, District Special Police Unit for Women and Children, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed.

14. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

15. DASTI.

VINOD GOEL, J.

OCTOBER 12, 2017 "shailendra"

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter