Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Renu Khanna & Ors vs Joginder Pal Madan & Ors (Hdfc Ergo ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 7065 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7065 Del
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2017

Delhi High Court
Renu Khanna & Ors vs Joginder Pal Madan & Ors (Hdfc Ergo ... on 7 December, 2017
$~28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                            Date of Decision: 07th December, 2017

+      MAC.APP. 184/2016

       RENU KHANNA & ORS                              ..... Appellants
                   Through:          Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Mr. Suresh
                                     Kumar and Mr. Rahul Mohod,
                                     Advocates

                         versus

       JOGINDER PAL MADAN & ORS
       (HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD)..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr.
                             Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advocates for
                             respondent No.3

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

                         JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs. 25,75,000/- has been awarded to the appellant Nos. 1 to

3.

2. The accident dated 20th November, 2013 resulted in the death of Rajesh Khanna. The deceased was aged 49 years at the time of accident and was survived by his mother, widow, daughter and son, who filed the application for compensation before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was an accountant with E2 Solutions earning Rs.2,88,000/- per annum. The deceased was also working as a part-time accountant with M/s R.N. Traders

earning a Rs.8,000/- per month.

3. The claimants examined Ms. Meghna Deshwal, Assistant Manager (HR) of E2 Solutions, who proved the appointment letter of deceased as Ex. PW1/B, salary record as Ex. PW1/C and salary register and employee register for the month of November, 2013 as Ex.PW1/D & Ex.PW1/E respectively. Sh. Naresh Kumar, Proprietor of M/s.R.N. Traders, was examined as PW3, who has relied upon ITR for the year 2014-2015 as Ex.PW3/A and Certificate dated 10th December, 2013 which is the part of the DAR as Ex. PW2/D.

4. The Claims Tribunal took income of the deceased as Rs.20,000/-, deducted 1/4th towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 13 according to the age of the deceased to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.23,40,000/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of love and affection, Rs. 1,00,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs.10,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses. The total compensation awarded is Rs.25,75,000/- along with interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of filing of petition.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of the hearing that the income of the deceased be taken as Rs.32,000/- per month and 30% future prospects should be taken into consideration for computing the compensation. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks reimbursement of medical expenses of the deceased and enhancement under the head of loss of estate.

6. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 urged at the time of hearing that the compensation awarded under the heads of loss of love and affection and loss of consortium is on a higher side. It is further submitted that the Claims

Tribunal has not deducted the Income Tax from the income of the deceased. It is further submitted that the rate of interest be reduced from 12% per annum to 9% per annum.

7. This Court is of the view that the occupational income of the deceased have been proved duly by the appellants. The deceased was working as an accountant with E2 Solutions earning Rs.2,88,000/- per annum. The appellants have also proved that the deceased was working as a part-time accountant with M/s R.L. Traders earning Rs.8,000/- per month. As such, the annual income of the deceased from both the sources was Rs.3,84,000/- (Rs.2,88,000 + Rs.96,000). The Income Tax payable on the aforesaid income as per the computation done by the Senior Standing Counsel of Income Tax Department is Rs.18,190/-. Deducting Rs.18,190/- from Rs.3,84,000/-, the annual income of the deceased is taken as Rs.3,65,810/- (Rs.30,484/- per month).

8. The deceased was aged 49 years at the time of the accident and 30% is added towards the future prospects according to the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi, 2017 SCC OnLine SC 1270. The deceased has left behind his widow, one daughter, one son and mother and, therefore, 1/4th is deducted towards personal expenses. Taking the income of the deceased as Rs.30,484/-, adding 30% towards future prospects, deducting 1/4th towards his personal expenses and applying the multiplier of 13, the loss of dependency is computed as Rs.49,50,895.84 (Rs.46,36,302.84 + Rs.1,39,593 + Rs.1,00,000 + Rs.40,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.25,000).

9. The appellants have incurred Rs.1,39,593/- on the treatment of the deceased after the accident. Copy of the bill has been placed on record as

Annexure P-9 at page 53. Rs.1,39,593/- is awarded to the appellants towards the medical expenses.

10. The compensation awarded under the head of loss of love and affection is fair and reasonable. However, the compensation awarded under the head of loss of consortium is reduced from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.40,000/-, Rs.10,000/- is awarded towards loss of estate and Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses. The total amount of compensation comes to Rs.49,50,895.84.

11. The Claims Tribunal has awarded interest @12% per annum, which is on a higher side and is, therefore, reduced to 9% per annum.

12. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is enhanced from Rs.25,75,000/- to Rs.49,50,895.84 along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.

13. Respondent No.3 is directed to deposit the enhanced award amount to the Registrar General of this Court within four weeks.

14. List for disbursement on 30th January, 2018.

15. The appellants shall remain present in Court on the next date of hearing along with copies of their savings bank account near the place of their residence, PAN Card as well as Aadhaar Card.

16. The concerned banks are directed not to issue any cheque book or debit card to the appellants and if the same have already been issued, the concerned banks are directed to cancel the same and make an endorsement on the passbook that no cheque book or debit card shall be issued to the appellants without the permission of this Court. The appellants shall produce the copy of this order before the concerned banks whereupon the banks shall make an endorsement on the passbooks. The appellants shall produce the

original passbooks with the necessary endorsement on the next date of hearing.

17. Copy of this judgement be given dasti to counsels for the parties under signatures of the Court Master.

DECEMBER 07, 2017                                 J.R. MIDHA, J.
rsk





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter