Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Taruna Malik vs The State , Govt Nct Of Delhi
2014 Latest Caselaw 5286 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5286 Del
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2014

Delhi High Court
Taruna Malik vs The State , Govt Nct Of Delhi on 28 October, 2014
$~19
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                   RESERVED ON : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2014
                                    DECIDED ON : 28th OCTOBER, 2014

+                  TEST.CASE.No. 61/2013
       TARUNA MALIK                                       ..... Petitioner
                          Through :    Mr.Hirein Sharma, Advocate.

                          versus

       THE STATE , GOVT NCT OF DELHI                      ..... Respondent
                     Through : None.


       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J.

1. Petitioner - Taruna Malik has filed the present petition under Section

272 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate of Will dated

18.11.2010 executed by Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi w/o Late Sh.Vishwa Nath

regarding her estate i.e. One half share in the property bearing No.A-674,

Block-A, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi. It is averred that Late Smt.Santosh

Bakshi executed the said Will in favour of the petitioner and Mrs.Harsh

Gogia.

2. It is averred that Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi was a resident of 6/22,

Shanti Niketan, New Delhi. She expired on 22.12.2012. At the time of her

death, she had left her last Will and Testament dated 18.11.2010 duly

registered as document No.6376 in Book No.III, Volume No.544 in the

office of Sub-Registrar-IX, New Delhi on 29.11.2010. She had bequeathed

her immovable properties in favour of the petitioner, and Mrs.Harsh Gogia,

her another niece (deceased's brother's daughter). She also named the

petitioner and Mrs.Harsh Gogia as the sole beneficiaries of the Will and as

per her last wishes, after her death the petitioner and Mrs. Harsh Gogia were

entitled to take probate of the Will dated 18.11.2010 from the Court of

competent jurisdiction in respect of the immovable properties mentioned

therein. It is further stated that the petitioner is beneficiary of the property

being half share in the property No.A-674, Block-A, Sarita Vihar, New

Delhi. She is already owner in her own right qua the other half of the portion

of the property. It is further stated that Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi was of

sound and disposing mind and was competent to execute the Will being the

absolute owner of the immovable properties mentioned in the schedule. The

Will was executed in the presence of attesting witnesses including Smt.Payal

Malik w/o Sh.Sudhir A.Shah.

3. List of legal heirs as detailed in Schedule-I filed along with the

petition is Smt.Taruna Malik (niece); Sh.Sudershan Kumar Malik (brother);

Smt.Santosh Malik (sister-in-law); Sh.Sharad Malik (nephew); Smt.Madhuri

Yadav (niece); Smt.Payal Malik (niece) and Smt.Harsh Gogia (niece).

Schedule - II describes the list of properties as detailed in the Will dated

18.11.2010. One DDA S.F.S. flat bearing No.22, Neeti Bagh, New Delhi is

stated to have been bequeathed in favour of Smt.Harsh Gogia. One half

share of the property in question has been bequeathed in favour of the

petitioner.

4. Ms.Nidhi Raman, Advocate appeared on behalf of the respondent

No.1 (State). By an order dated 11.09.2013 notice was ordered to be given to

the legal heirs mentioned in Schedule - I from Sl.Nos.2 to 7. Citation was

ordered to be published in 'The Statesman' in English and 'The Jansatta' in

Hindi. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 appeared through their counsel Mr.Siddharth

Dior and Mr.Prem Anand and furnished no objection to the petition being

allowed. Mr.Kunal Anand, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 7

also gave no objection to the petition being allowed. They were directed to

file affidavits of 'no objection'. Consequently, their affidavits were taken on

record. Citation was also published on 17.11.2013 in the newspaper 'The

Statesman' and 'The Jansatta'. No public person filed any objection against

the grant of probate pursuant to the publication of the citation in the

newspaper 'The Statesman' and 'The Jansatta'.

5. The petitioner has led evidence by way of affidavit. In her affidavit

(Ex.PW-1/A), she has reiterated the averments made in the petition. She has

stated on oath that Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi was a resident of 6/22, Shanti

Niketan and died at New Delhi on 22.12.2012. The original death certificate

was exhibited as PW-1/1. She further deposed that Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi

at the time of her death left her last Will and Testament dated 18.11.2010

(Ex.PW-1/2). The original Will has been filed in Test Case No.62/2013. As

per her last Will (Ex.PW-1/2) she bequeathed her immovable properties in

her (petitioner) favour and in favour of Mrs.Harsh Gogia. Both of them were

named as sole beneficiaries of the Will. She further deposed that Late

Smt.Santosh Bakshi was of sound and disposing mind and was competent to

execute the Will in question being the absolute owner of half share of the

property in question. She further produced affidavit evidence of Smt.Payal

Malik (Ex.PW-2/A). She corroborated the version of the petitioner and

stated that Will dated 18.11.2010 (Ex.PW-1/2). was executed by

Smt.Santosh Bakshi and she had put her signatures thereon as one of the

attesting witnesses in the presence of the testatrix and the other attesting

witness. She had seen the said test tricks and other attesting witness signing

the said Will in her presence at the same time. Smt.Payal Malik identified

signatures of Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi at the Will at point 'A' and that of

the other attesting witness at point 'B' and her own signatures at point 'C'.

She also testified that deceased Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi was in her

complete senses and she executed the Will without any coercion, undue

influence or misrepresentation in favour of Smt.Harsh Gogia and Taruna

Malik out of love and affection for them.

6. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined

the record. Will (Ex.PW-1/2) has been proved as per law. It was executed by

the deceased Late Smt.Santosh Bakshi in the presence of two attesting

witnesses Smt.Payal Malik and Sh.Sanjay Sood. None of the persons have

come forward to challenge the Will. The legal heirs of the deceased

respondent Nos.2 to 7 have given their 'no objection' to the grant of probate.

The petitioner has produced evidence by way of affidavit of attesting

witness Smt.Payal Malik. Accordingly, I do not find any impediment in

granting the probate to the petitioner in respect of the Will of testatrix.

7. Valuation report has been submitted by the Executive Magistrate,

Sarita Vihar, Distt. South-East, New Delhi. As per his report, the half share

of the aforesaid properties comes out to the value of ` 38,10,000/- only.

8. In the light of the above discussion, probate of the Will dated

18.11.2010 is granted to the petitioner to the extent of one half share in the

property bearing No.A-674, Block-A, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, subject to

her paying requisite Court Fee and furnishing administrative bond with one

surety, to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court.

9. The petition stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J OCTOBER 28, 2014 / tr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter