Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 6158 Del
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2012
$~21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Judgment:12.10.2012.
+ COMPANY PETITION NO. 303 OF 2012
In the matter of:
The Companies Act, 1956 (the "Act");
And
In the matter of Sections 391 to 394
of the Companies Act, 1956
And
In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation between Karamtara
Fasteners Private Limited, Karamtara Steel Private Limited and
Sunder Rolling Mills Private Limited with Karamtara Engineering
Private Limited and their respective shareholders
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:
Sunder Rolling Mills Private Limited, a Company incorporated under the
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its Registered Office
at C/o Avinash P. Jain, H/341, Ground Floor, New Rajendra Nagar, New
Delhi-110066
... Petitioner Company
Through: Mr. Rohit Puri, Advocate
for the Petitioner Company
Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy
Registrar of Companies.
Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate
for Official Liquidator
C.P. No.303/2012 Page 1 of 7
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
1. This Second Motion petition has been filed under Sections
391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the Petitioner /
Transferor Company which is a 100% subsidiary of the
Transferee Company seeking sanction of the Scheme (for short
"Scheme").
2. The Petitioner Company had earlier filed C.A. (M) No. 53 of
2012 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation of
shareholder's meetings. Vide order dated 23rd March 2012, this
Court allowed the application and dispensed with the
requirement of convening meeting of the share holders, but
directed the meetings of Secured and Unsecured Creditors of
the Transferor Company.
3. The Transferor Company (Petitioner) thereafter filed the
present Petition under Section 391 (2) of the Companies Act,
1956 seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide
order dated 06th July 2012 this Court issued notice in the
Petition to the Regional Director, Northern Region and the
Official Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be
published in "Indian Express" (English, Delhi Edition) and
"Jansatta" (Hindi Delhi Edition). Affidavit of publication
dated 6th September 2012 has been filed by the Petitioner
Company showing compliance regarding publication of
Citations in the aforesaid News papers on 31st August 2012.
Copies of the news papers cuttings, in original, containing the
publications have been filed with the affidavit of publication.
4. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the Petitioner Company. Based on the
information received the official liquidator has filed his report
wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any
person / party interested in the Scheme in any manner till the
date of filing of this report. The official liquidator further
submits that the affairs of the Transferor Company do not
appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the
interest of its members or to public interest as per the second
proviso of Section 394 (1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
5. In response to the notices issued in the Petition, learned
Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his affidavit / report dated 5th October 2012.
Relying on clause 8 of the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has
stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation all
the employees of the Transferor Company shall become the
employees of Transferee Company without any break or
interruption in their services upon sanctioning of the Scheme
of Amalgamation by the Hon'ble Court. The counsel for the
Regional Director also states that in the scheme there is no
mention of compliance by the Petitioner Company of
Accounting Standard - 14 issued by Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India.
6. The Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner states that such compliance
will apply to the Transferee Company, which has already filed
an undertaking dated 12th March 2012 before the Regional
Director, Bombay stating therein that they will comply with
the said Accounting Standard-14. It is further stated by the
counsel for the Petitioner that since then the Hon'ble High
Court of Bombay has allowed the scheme vide its order dated
29th June 2012.
7. No objection has been received to the Scheme of
Amalgamation from any other party. In this regard, Mr. Rohit
Puri Advocate of Transferor Company submits that he has not
received any notice from any person opposing the Petition
pursuant to the citations published in the Newspapers
respectively.
8. The counsel for the Official Liquidator and the Regional
Director who are present in the Court today have not raised
any further objections in sanctioning the Scheme of
Amalgamation.
9. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders, Secured
and Unsecured Creditors of the Petitioner Company, affidavits
/ reports filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and
the Official Liquidator, attached with this court to the
proposed Scheme, there appears to be no impediment to the
grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation.
Consequently sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of
Amalgamation under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies
Act, 1956. The Petitioner Company will comply with the
statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy
of the order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30
days from receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of
Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 and in terms
of the Scheme, the whole or part of the undertaking, all
properties, rights and powers of the Transferor Company be
transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without
any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the Scheme, all
the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be
transferred to the Transferee company without any further act
or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into effect the Transferor
Company shall stand dissolved without winding up. It is,
however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an
order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes
or any other charges, if payable in accordance with any law; or
permission / compliance with any other requirement which
may be specifically required under any law.
10. The Petitioner Company voluntarily states that it would
deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with the Common Pool Fund
of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from today.
11. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Order Dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J OCTOBER 12, 2012 A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!