Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sandeep Singh And Ors vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors
2012 Latest Caselaw 3595 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3595 Del
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2012

Delhi High Court
Sandeep Singh And Ors vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors on 29 May, 2012
Author: Suresh Kait
$~26
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%              Judgment delivered on: 29th May, 2012

+              W.P.(C) 3207/2012

       SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS                       ..... Petitioners
                        Through : Ms.Sriparna Chatterjee &
                        Mr.Ajesh Luthra, Advs.

                       versus


       GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS             ...... Respondents
                          Through : Ms.Anjana Gosain & Ms.Prerna
                          Shah Deo, Advs for respondent Nos.1 & 2.
                          Mr.Latika Choudhary & Mr. B.S. Rawat,
                          Advs for respondent No.3.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.No.6860/2012(delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing stands condoned.

CM stands disposed of.

+ W.P.(C) 3207/2012

1. Vide instant petition, the petitioners have prayed to pass the direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to repatriate them to DTTE under GNCT of Delhi and post them in any other Technological

Institute under the DTTE.

2. In the instant petition, it is averred that on 29.11.2011, the Principal/ Pro Vice Chancellor, DTU issued a meeting notice which stated that high power committee meeting was again scheduled on 07.12.2011. Even before that on the issue raised in the petition, number of times the meetings of the respondents have been held.

3. The petitioners being aggrieved, agitated the Technical Staff Association once again and made a representation dated 29.11.2011 to the Chief Secretary, GNCT of Delhi incorporating their grievances. However, there is no response from their end.

4. Finally, on 03.01.2012, the petitioners sent a legal notice through their counsel to the respondents requesting necessary action to be taken for the reversion of the employees and redressal of the grievance of the petitioners.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, submits that till date neither the legal notice nor the representation was responded by the respondents.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2, submits that the aforesaid representation and the legal notice of the petitioners shall be decided within six weeks and decisions thereon shall be intimated to the petitioners.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent Nos.1 & 2 are directed to decide the representation/legal notice made by the petitioners

within six weeks from today and outcome thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners.

8. In case, the petitioners still feel aggrieved, they are at liberty to challenge the decision of the respondents.

9. Instant petition stands disposed of in above terms.

10. In view of above order, CM No.6859/2012 renders infructuous and stands disposed of.

11. Copy of order be given dasti to all the parties for compliance.

12. No order as to costs.

SURESH KAIT, J

MAY 29, 2012 Mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter