Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1994 Del
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 22.03.2012
+ W.P.(C) No.4119/1999
Mr.Anand Ballabh Dobhal ... Petitioner
versus
The Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : None.
For Respondents : Ms.Barkha Babbar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J.
No one has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
This Court had issued Court notice to the petitioner by order
dated 8th August, 2011. The Court notice was issued at the address of
the petitioner on the record could not be served. The Court notice could
not be served on the address given by the respondents. The Court
notice has come back unserved with different remarks.
The Court notice issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner
has also remained unserved.
In the circumstances, this Court has left with no option but to
dismiss the writ petition in default of appearance of the petitioner or his
counsel.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
MARCH 22, 2012 vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!