Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4556 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025
1/2
Digitally signed
by SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM SINGH
SINGH RAGHUVANSHI
RAGHUVANSHI
Date: 2025.09.19
18:06:37 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ACQA No. 708 of 2024
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH versus RAHUL SHARMA
Order Sheet
18/09/2025 Ms. Pragya Pandey, Dy. G.A. for the State.
Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate for the
Respondent.
Upon perusal of the record during the final hearing, it is observed that the case involves 250 kg 800 grams of cannabis. The Trial Court framed charges under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(B)(II)
(b) of the NDPS Act. However, there appears to be a discrepancy in the judgment dated 27.03.2019. While the first paragraph of the judgment mentions the seized quantity as 250 kg 500 grams and refers to Section 8(c) read with Section 20(B)(II)(b), paragraph 24 of the judgment mentions acquittal under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(B)(II)(a) of the NDPS Act. Given that the seized quantity is commercial and falls under Section 20(B)(II)(c) of the NDPS Act, which
prescribes a maximum sentence of 20 years.
In view of above, in accordance with Rules 24 & 25 of the Chhattisgarh High Court Rules, 2007, the Registry is directed to verify the records and list the matter before the appropriate Bench.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge
Shubham
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!