Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4186 Chatt
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025
1/2 Digitally signed
by SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM SINGH
SINGH RAGHUVANSHI
RAGHUVANSHI
Date: 2025.09.03
11:19:55 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
TAXC No. 133 of 2025
M/S VARSHA CONSTRUCTION versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 1(1)
Order Sheet
02/09/2025 Mr. Nikhlesh Begani and Mr. Apurv Goyal, Advocates
for the Appellant.
Mr. Amit Chaudhari and Mr. Ajay Kumrani,
Advocates for the Respondent.
Heard.
This appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law:
1. Whether the CIT (appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are justified in dismissing the appeals holding that the Assessing Officer has rightly processed the return of the appellant herein under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act ignoring the fact that in light of conflicting judgments on the issue of due date the Assessing Officer was required to resort to the provisions contained in Section 143(3)/Section 147 of the Act, by recording a finding which is perverse to the record?
Let a notice be issued to the Respondent.
Mr. Chaudhari, Advocate excepts notice on behalf of
the Respondent, hence issuance of notice to the Respondent stands dispensed with.
As prayed by learned Counsel for the Respondent, 4 weeks' time is granted to file reply.
List after four weeks.
Filing of paper-book is exempted.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Judge Judge
Shubham
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!