Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2313 Chatt
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2025
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Digitally
signed by
VAISHALI
VAISHALI LUCKY
CRA No. 445 of 2025
LUCKY NAGARIA
NAGARIA Date:
2025.03.07
18:15:03
•
+0530
Ashish @ Harish Sontakke S/o Late Naresh Sontakke Aged
About 26 Years R/o Motipur, Azad Chowk, Ward No. 03,
Outpost- Chikhli, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
...Appellant
versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police
Station - Kotwali, Outpost- Chikhli, Dist.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
... Respondent
Order on Board
06/03/2025 Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Karan Kumar Behrani, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Heard on I.A. No.01 of 2025, application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.
By the impugned judgment dated 14.02.2025
passed by the learned 1st Upper Sessions Judge,
Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) in
Sessions Trial No. 37 of 2021 the accused/appellant
stands convicted and sentenced as under:
Offence Sentence
U/s 307 of IPC R.I. for 3 years and fine
of Rs. 2,000/- in default
of payment of fine further
R.I. for one month.
The sentence is ordered to run concurrently.
Prosecution story in brief is that on
14.12.2020, during 10:15 P.M, the injured Naveen
Kumar Barley (injured) along with his wife towards
Satnami Samaj Bhawan at that point of time
appellant assaulted on right portion of neck by
means and also on right shoulder (backside)
thereafter, F.I.R. was registered against the
appellant under Section 307 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
appellant has been falsely implicated in this case, he
has not committed any offence as alleged against
him. Maximum jail sentence awarded to appellant is
three years, During that appellant was on bail and
he has not misused the liberty granted earlier.
Appeal may take some time for final hearing, hence,
sentence awarded to appellant may be suspended
and he may be enlarge on bail.
Learned State counsel opposing the
submission of counsel for the appellant.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, submissions of counsel for the parties,
maximum period of jail sentence awarded to
appellant, further the fact that during trial,
appellant was on bail and he has not misused the
liberty granted to him earlier, appeal may take some
time for final hearing, I am of the view that present
is a fit case to suspend sentence and release the
appellant on bail.
Accordingly, I.A. No.1, application for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail to
appellant is allowed. It is directed that execution of
substantive jail sentences imposed on appellant
shall remain suspended and he be released on bail
on his executing a personal bond for a sum
Rs.10,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the
satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance
before the Registry of his Court on 17.04.2025. He
shall thereafter appear before the Trial Court on a
date to be given by the Registry of this Court and
shall continue to appear there on all such other
subsequent dates as are given to him by the said
Court, till disposal of this appeal.
Certified copy, as per rules.
Sd/-
(Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE
vaishali
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!