Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3173 Chatt
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2025
1
2025:CGHC:26300
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 5368 of 2025
1 - Maghan Singh S/o Kawal Singh Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Bijarwar ,
Ward No. 12, Khalhetola Tehsil Pendraroad District - Gaurela Pendra Marwahi
(C.G.) - 495117
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department (P.W.D)
Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Engineer In Chief Public Works Department (P.W.D) Atal Nagar Sector - 19,
Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department (P.W.D) Bilaspur District
- Bilaspur (C.G.)
4 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department (P.W.D) Bilaspur District - Bilaspur
(C.G.)
5 - Executive Enineer (Pendra Division) ) Public Works Department (P.W.D)
District - Gaurela- Pendra - Marwahi (C.G.)
6 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Bilaspur District -
Bilaspur (C.G.)
7 - Treasury District Treasury Gaurela Pendra Marwahi District - Gaurela
Pendra - Marwahi (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rameshwari Kumari, Advocate
For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Order on Board
20/06/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is retired
employee of the respondents' Departments and was working as Work
Charged Contingency paid employee. It is further submitted that in light
of judgment passed by this Court in WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram
Patel and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other
connected matters, decided on 30.09.2022, present petitioner is also
entitled for leave encashment.
2. Learned State counsel would submit that sufficient documents have not
been filed by the petitioner, and it is also not reflected as to whether the
petitioner has completed the minimum service to avail the benefit of leave
encashment.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on
record.
4. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on merits of the case, this
petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed
representation before the concerned respondents/competent authority
within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order
with all necessary documents to substantiate his claim. In that event, on
due verification, if the petitioner is found to be similarly situated person,
as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra), his claim shall be decided by
the respondents in light of judgment passed in that case expeditiously
preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of submission of the
said representation.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with aforesaid
observation and direction.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!