Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramsai Nirmalkar vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 980 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 980 Chatt
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Ramsai Nirmalkar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 January, 2025

                                            1




                                                      2025:CGHC:869


                                                                      NAFR

           HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                              WPS No. 24 of 2025

1 - Ramsai Nirmalkar S/o Ramjhool Nirmalkar Aged About 69 Years Retired
Tool Man Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Works Department Sub
Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
2 - Krishna Kumar Rajak S/o Bahoran Rajak Aged About 65 Years Retired
Mechanical Helper Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Works
Department Sub Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
3 - Om Prakash Kaushik S/o Late Nem Lal Kaushik Aged About 36 Years R/o
Ward No. 48 Purana Sarkanda Lodhi Para, P.S. Sarkanda District Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh Mother Of Petitioner Namely Smt. Geeta Bai Kaushik Was Retired
Chowkidar Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Works Department Sub
Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.


                                                            ... Petitioners


                                     versus


1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department
Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District - Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
2 - Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Sihawa Bhawan New Raipur,
District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Bilaspur Range District - Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh.
4 - Executive Engineer (E And M) Public Works Department, Bilaspur Division
District - Bilaaspur Chhattisgarh.
5 - Joint Director Pension, Account And Treasury Department, Bilaspur
Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
                                           2



                                                               ... Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate For Res./State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board 07/01/2025

1. Heard Mr. F. S. Khare, learned counsel petitioners as well as Ms. Shailja

Shukla, learned Deputy Government Advocate for State/respondent.

2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:

10.1 That this Hon'ble Curt may kindly be pleased to alow the writ petition and be pleased to issue an order/direction to the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of leave encashment to the petitioners.

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner's matter.

10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners were working

as "work charged Contingency Paid Employees" under the respondent

authorities and after completion of age of superannuation they have

retired from their services but till date the respondents have not

extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioners. He submits that

in the light of judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S)

No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of

Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other connected matters decided on

30.09.2022, the petitioners are entitled for leave encashment and

respondent authorities be directed to consider the matter of the

petitioners expeditiously within specified time.

4. Learned State counsel submits that as the petitioners are not pressing

this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the issue

for grant of leave encashment, at this stage, she is having no objection.

5. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents

available in record.

6. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this

petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make detailed

representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority

within the period of '30 days' from the date of receipt of copy of this order

with all necessary documents to substantiate their claim. In the event of

filing of representation, on due verification, if the petitioners are found to

be similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel

(surpa), their claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of

judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably within

the period of '90 days' from the date of submission of the said

representation.

7. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observations

and directions.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE

amita

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter