Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1458 Chatt
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2025
1/3
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 1205 of 2003
SUSHANTO versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Order Sheet
27/01/2025 Ms. Renu Kochar, learned counsel for the appellant/s.
Mr. Aman Tamboli, P.L. for the respondent/State.
The appellant is produced before this Court from Police Line- Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.).
Heard on I.A. No.02/2025, an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail under Section 430 of BNSS, 2023.
By the impugned judgment dated 04.11.2003 passed by the learned First A.S.J., Kanker C.G. in Sessions Trial No.460/2001, appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable mentioned as under:
Conviction Sentence U/s. 306 of the Indian Penal R.I. for 07 years with fine of Code. Rs. 1,000/- (in default of six months R.I.)
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that
the application for suspension and grant of bail was allowed by
this Court on 17.11.2003 and the appellant was released on bail.
Thereafter, as no representation was made on behalf of the
appellant, a non-bailable warrant was issued against him. She
further submits that on 10.07.2024 the concerned Police Station
vide its report dated 14.09.2023 informed that appellant is in jail
in District Chandrapur (M.H.) since 20.04.2022 in connection
with Crime No. 3/2022 registered at P.S. Parmili, District
Gadchirolil (M.H.) u/s 452, 476 of I.P.C. On 08.04.2024 Hon'ble
High Court issued production warrant for his presence on
17.09.2024, on 17.09.2024 report dated 13.09.2024 received from
office of Senior Superintendent informed that appellant has been
released from district jail Chandrapur (M.H). She submits that on
17.09.2024 non-bailable warrant was issued through concerned
Superintendent of Police for his production on 02.12.2024 and the
Hon'ble High Court on 02.12.2024 non-bailable warrant was
issued against the appellant for his production before the Hon'ble
Court on 27.01.2025. She further submits that as the appellant
was in jail in some other crime no. therefore he could not be
represented. She prays for allowing the application.
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State
opposes the submissions made by counsel for the appellant.
Heard.
Be that as it may, after hearing the learned counsel for the
parties and the sentence awarded to the appellant was earlier
suspended by this Court and he was released on bail, therefore,
this Court is inclined to allow this application.
Execution of substantive jail sentence imposed on the
appellant shall remain suspended and he is directed to be released
on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-
with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the
concerned trial Court for his appearance before the concerned trial
Court on 21.04.2025. He shall thereafter appear before the trial
Court on a date to be given to him and shall continue to appear
there on all such subsequent dates as are given to him, till the
disposal of this appeal.
In view of the above, I.A. No.02/2025, application for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail is allowed.
As the case is of the year 2003, let it be listed in the week after next.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
H.Ansari
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!