Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1367 Chatt
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025
Digitally signed
by ASHISH
ASHISH TIWARI
Date:
TIWARI 2025.02.12
15:46:08
+0530
2025:CGHC:3802
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.C.C. No. 30 of 2025
Bahadur Singh Yadav, S/o Late Shiv Ram Singh Yadav, aged about 57 Years,
(Now 65 Years), R/o Kohka, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil And District - Durg, Civil And
Revenue District - Durg (C.G.)
------Applicant
Versus
1. Mahadev Prasad Yadav, S/o Chaitu Ram Yadav, aged about 60 Years,
R/o Near Durg Saw Mill, Village Kohka, Dupela, Bhilai, Tahsil And District -
Durg(C.G.)
2. General Public of Village Kohka, Patwari Halka No. 14, Tahsil and District
Durg (C.G.)
-----Respondent
For Applicant - Shri Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate.
For Respondents - None appeared.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board
22/01/2025
1. This MCC has been filed for modification in paragraph Nos. 2, 4(1) and 14(1)
of the order dated 19/12/2024 passed by this Court in First Appeal No. 464 of
2017.
2. Counsel for the applicant submits that before the trial court as per his plaint
the plaintiff sought for declaration of title on account of adverse possession in
respect of property comprised in part of khasra no. 7339/5 (old no. 317/3),
rakba 0.013 hectare (1400 sq.feet) and in memo of first appeal before this
Court also mentioned the same.
3. It is submitted that the trial court in the impugned judgment dated 01.09.2017
in para no. 6 para no. 6 & 8 also described that 1400 sq. feet of disputed
property is in possession of plaintiff, but by clerical errors impugned
judgment and decree has been passed by the Trial Court for 0.024 hectare in
place of 0.013 hectare (1400 sq.feet) of disputed property.
4. It is further submitted that due to this errors have occurred in the judgment
dated 19.12.2024 in First Appeal No. 464/2017 passed by this Court and
area has been mentioned 0.024 hectare in place of 0.013 hectare (1400
sq.feet). The confusion arose because 0.024 hectare land had been
purchased in the name of plaintiff. Para 3 of judgment dated 19.12.2024
passed by this Hon'ble Court in F.A. No. 464/2017 also makes it clear that
remaining portion of said khasra number about 1400 sq. feet was sold by
Sashank Bhushan to defendant no.1 on 18/08/1986 by registered sale deed.
5. Counself or the applicant thus submits that the modification is necessary in
judgment dated 19.12.2024 in the following terms:-
i) In Para 2 - Area 0.013 hectare (1400 sq.feet) in place of 0.024 hectare.
(ii) In Para 4(1) piece of 0.024 hectare (1400 sq.feet) in place of piece of 0.024 hectare.
(iii) In para 14 (1) Area 0.013 hectare (1400 sq.feet) in place of 0.024 hectare.
6. Accordingly, M.C.C. is allowed. The disputed area mentioned in order dated
19/12/2024 to be read as per paragraph No. 5 of this order. Ordered
accordingly.
7. Decree be drawn accordingly.
Sd/- Sd/-/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
Judge
Ashish
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!