Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1218 Chatt
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2025
1/3
2025:CGHC:2401-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPCR No. 19 of 2025
Ku. Sonam Lakra D/o Agastus Lakra Aged About 27 Years R/o Village-
Sajbahar, Post-Tapkara, District- Jashpur (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home (Police)
Department, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Atal Nagar, New
Raipur (C.G.)
3 - The Inspector General Of Police Ambikapur Range, District- Surguja
(C.G.)
4 - The Superintendent Of Police Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.)
5 - The Station House Officer Police Station, Tapkara, District- Jashpur
(C.G.)
6 - Shivmangal Sai Posted As Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat,
Sajbahar, District- Jashpur (C.G.)
7 - Ankit Jaiswal Ward Panch, Gram Panchayat, Sajbahar, District- Jashpur
(C.G.)
Digitally
... Respondents
signed by
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
VEDPRAKASH
DEWANGAN
2/3
For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate
For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J.
15/01/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the
following prayers:
"(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby directing the respondent authorities to register the FIR against the respondents no. 6 & 7 on the written complaint filed by the petitioner disclosing cognizable offence, forthwith, in accordance with law.
(ii) To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite several
complaints have been made no action has been taken by the State
respondents.
3. We have perused the prayers and pleadings made in the writ petition.
4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the
grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the Court
below by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or under Section
200 of the Cr.P.C. (now, under Section 175(3) or under Section 223 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023). He further submits that
the controversy involved in the present matter has already been
decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492
of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal
Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020
as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal
v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023,
dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also
dismissed in terms of the said order.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the
petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice
ved
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!