Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 102 Chatt
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA No. 111 of 2024
Jitendra Goel Versus Sewak Ram Pandey & others
21.06.2024 Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. for the State/Respondent No. 3.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the Appellant would submit that on the basis of
decree obtained by committing fraud for Specific Performance,
respondent No. 2 who is the original seller though had sold the subject
land prior to the appellant, but subsequently by preparing a backdated
sale agreement and on that basis, Specific Performance decree was
granted and the sale deed has been executed.
Now, it is stated that the said subject land since has been acquired
and the compensation has been deposited, respondents No. 1 and 2 are
hand in gloves to withdraw the amount though the entitlement is that of
appellant.
He refers to the judgment dated 01.08.2018 passed by this Court in
MA No. 27 of 2018, wherein this Court has directed for deposit of the
compensation amount of the Land Acquisition Case No. 09(5)/A-82/2014-
15 in a Nationalised Bank. It has been stated that the said amount has
been deposited. Further, it is stated that if the amount is withdrawn, then
the entire filing of the appeal may become infructuous.
Earlier, this Court has already issued the notice to respondents No.
1 & 2. Dasti Service is also permitted apart from the usual mode.
On payment of process fee, the Dasti notice be issued.
List this case in the week commencing 15.07.2024.
In the meanwhile, the amount deposited in the Bank shall not be
allowed to be withdrawn by either of the parties till the next date of
hearing.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) (Rajani Dubey)
Judge Judge
Uttej
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!