Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5892 Chatt
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2022
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 5969 of 2022
1. Union of India Through Its General Manager, South East Central
Railway Pin 495004, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. South East Central Railway Through Its Divisional Railway Manager,
Division Nagpur, Kings Way Pin 440001
3. Senior Divisional Personal Officer South East Central Railway, Division
Nagpur, Kings Way Pin 440001
---- Petitioners
Versus
Susheel Kumar Uikey S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Uikey Aged About 25 Years
Occupation Labourer, R/o Village Sarasdol, Tehsil Ghansour, District : Seoni,
Madhya Pradesh
---- Respondent
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ______________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General _____________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari, Judge Order on Board
Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
20.09.2022
Heard Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned Deputy Solicitor General,
appearing for the petitioners.
2. This petition is presented against an order dated 22.04.2022 passed
by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench (for short, 'CAT') in
Original Application No. 200/605/2019, by which the CAT directed the
petitioners to consider the case of the applicant before the CAT for
appointment within a period of three months.
3. The applicant before the CAT is grandson of ancestor, whose land was
acquired for the purpose of conversion of Jabalpur Gondia Narrow gauge line
to Broad-gauge line. The petitioners had a policy for giving appointment to
sole owner of land or son/daughter/husband/wife of the sole owner, whose
land or a portion thereof was acquired for the project.
4. Mr. Mishra submits that this petition is squarely covered by an order of
this Court dated 08.04.2022 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.2480 of 2022 and
accordingly, he submits that this writ petition may be disposed of in the light
of the said order.
5. In the order dated 08.04.2022 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.2480 of
2022, at paragraphs-3 to 6, it was observed as follows :
"3. The applicants before the CAT are grandsons of
ancestors, whose lands were acquired for the
purpose of extension of broad-gauge railway lines
from Nagpur to Chhindwada. The appellants had a
policy for giving appointment to sole owner of land or
son/ daughter/ husband/ wife of the sole owner,
whose land or a portion thereof was acquired for the
project.
4. The learned CAT relied on its earlier judgment in
case of Yashvant Kumar v. Union of India (Original
Application No.203/929/2014), decided on
28.11.2017, which was affirmed by the Division
Bench of this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.1349 of
2018 (South East Central Railway and Others v.
Yashvant and Others), decided on 03.04.2018, and
accordingly, issued the directions as noted
hereinabove.
5. It is pointed by Mr. Mishra that against the
judgment of this Court dated 03.04.2018 passed in
Writ Petition (S) No.1349 of 2018, a Special Leave
Petition was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
which is pending consideration.
6. As the Division Bench of this Court in Writ
Petition (S) No.1349 of 2018 had held that a
grandson was entitled to be appointed on
rehabilitation ground due to extension of railway
route, we see no good ground to interfere with the
order of the learned CAT."
6. In view of the above submission of Mr. Mishra and in view of the order
dated 08.04.2022 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.2480 of 2022, the writ
petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No cost.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Arup Kumar Goswami) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Chief Justice Judge
Chandra
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!