Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1162 Chatt
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CR.A. No. 1349 of 2017
Maniram, S/o. Purnuram Uraon, aged about 31 years, R/o. Ward No. 3, Gharghoda,
Uraonpara, Police Station Gharghoda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station Gharghoda,
District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
Mr. Ashish Gupta, counsel for the appellant.
04/03/2022 Mr. Himanshu Sharma, P.L. for the State.
Heard on I.A. No.2/2019, application under Section 389 of
Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.
Appellant has been convicted by the judgment of conviction
and order of sentence dated 27.07.2017, passed in S.T.
No.109/2016, by the learned Sessions Judge, Raigarh, District-
Raigarh (C.G.) in the following manner :-
U/s. 302 of the I.P.C. : Life imprisonment and fine of
Rs.1000/- and in default of
payment of fine, further undergo
two months rigorous
imprisonment more.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that
the conviction against the appellant is erroneous and
unsustainable. The eye-witnesses of this case namely Purnu Ram
Uraon (P.W.-1), Nirmala Uraon (P.W.-2), Ashok Uraon (P.W.-3) and
Laxmiprasad (P.W.-8) have turned hostile and have not supported
the prosecution case. The conviction against the appellant is based
only on the basis of the evidence of seizure of knife and the FSL
report, which by itself not conclusive against the appellant.
Therefore, the appellant is entitled for grant of bail during the
pendency of this appeal. It is prayed that this application be
allowed.
Per contra, the learned State counsel opposes the prayer for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail. It is submitted that the
prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. It is
submitted that in the cross-examination Purnu Ram Uraon (P.W.-1),
there is admission, which shows the presence of appellant in the
house, where the deceased was found injured, who later on died.
The incriminating evidence against the appellant is recovery of knife
at his instance and also the presence of human blood on the knife
according to the FSL report. Therefore, the conviction against the
appellant is sustainable. It is prayed that the application for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail be rejected.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and
perused the records of the trial Court.
Considered on the submissions and perused the evidence
present in the record of the case. Taking into consideration the
evidence present in the record of the trial Court, we are of this
opinion that it is a fit case to suspend the sentence and release the
appellant on bail.
Accordingly, I.A. No.2/2019 application for suspension of
sentence and grant of bail is allowed.
Execution of substantive jail sentence imposed on appellant
shall remain suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on
his executing a personal bond for a sum Rs.25,000/- with one
surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his
appearance before the Registry of this Court on 20th June, 2022.
He shall thereafter appear before the trial Court on a date to be
given by the Registry of this Court and shall continue to appear
there on all such subsequent dates as are given to him by the said
Court, till the disposal of this appeal.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- Sd/-
(R.C.S. Samant) (Arvind Singh Chandel)
Judge Judge
balram
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!