Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4026 Chatt
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
SA No. 295 of 2012
Sarojani Bai Versus Kejuram And Ors.
24.06.2022 Mr. Animesh Verma, counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Ishwari Gritlahre, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Heard on admission.
Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that though the trial Court
has recorded its finding with regard to issue No. 2 and 3 with regard to partition
in favour of the plaintiff still it has dismissed the suit on the count that the
plaintiff during the life time of his father cannot claim partition over the co-
parcener property during the life time of his father. Against that he has
preferred first appeal which was also dismissed by the Additional District
Judge, Kabirdham.
The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law :-
"Whether, the trial Court was justified in dismissing the suit though
recorded the finding that partition between father and brother was void ab initio
still erred in not granting share to the daughter in the light of the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma
{(2020) 9 SCC 1}?
Issue notice to the respondents by ordinary and registered mode.
List after five weeks.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE
Deshmukh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!