Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4552 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2022
Page 1 of 3
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRA No. 1427 of 2021
Netram Dhritlahre S/o Govind Ram Dhritlahre Aged About 27 Years R/o Village
Baronda, Police Station Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Rajim, District
Gariyaband Chhattisgarh --- Respondent
18.07.2022 Mr. K.K. Dewangan, counsel for appellant.
Mr. Praveen Shrivastava, PL for the State/respondent.
Mr. S.P. Sahu, counsel for the Objector.
Heard on IA No. 01 application for suspension of sentence and
grant of bail.
By the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated
01.10.2021 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gariyaband, CG Sessions
Trial No. 10/2019 appellant has been convicted for the ofence
punishable under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo
Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and fne of Rs. 2000/-, in default
of payment of fne 1 years additional RI.
Case of the prosecution in brief is that the complainant lodged
a report at police station alleging therein on 17.11.2018 at about 12
PM, he was sitting near Thakur Complex District Cooperative Central
Bank at that time, the appellant came there and abused him with
flthy language and also inlicted cut injury over his neck and also
poured petrol on him and tried to burn him.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that if the entire
evidence is taken as it is then also he cannot be convicted for ofence
punishable under Section 307 IPC. The appellant remains for
treatments in the hospital only ½ hours and thereafter he was
discharge. There was no intention to cause injury to the victim and
therefore, under Section 307 is not made out. Looking to the nature
of injuries and the statement of the Dr. Piyush Shriwas (PW-8) the
injury is not in serious in nature to cause death. He further submits
that appellant remained in jail for about 1 year and one month. It is
further submits that the appellant and the victim/injured have been
compromised and on that efect an application of under Section 320
of Cr.PC r/w Section 482 have been fled stated therein that the
accused and victim has compromise the dispute and fne amount has
already been deposited.
On the other hand, learned State counsel and objector submits
that looking to the manner in which ofence was committed and the
injury is at vital parts, nature of injury would be determining factor
for coming to the conclusion, it is not a case made out to grant bail to
the appellant for the said commission of ofence. He further submits
that 7 years imprisonment has been awarded and only about 1 year
and 1 month has been completed therefore, appellant is not entitled
for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.
Having heard counsel for the parties, considering facts and
circumstances of the case fact that the nature of injury and period of
detention and the statement of the Dr. Piyush Shriwas (PW-8) and
appeal is likely to take sometime, I am inclined to grant of suspension
of sentence and grant of bail.
Accordingly, IA No. is allowed.
The substantive jail sentence awarded to the appellant is
suspended during the pendency of this appeal and he is directed to
release on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.
25,000/- along with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of
the concerned trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of
this Court on 27.09.2022. He shall thereafter appear before the trial
Court on a date to be given by the Registry of this Court and shall
continue to appear there on all such subsequent dates as is given to
him by the said Court, till the disposal of this appeal.
List this case for fnal hearing.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Pawan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!