Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4264 Chatt
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3220 of 2022
• Mritunjay Singh S/o Vijay Singh Aged About 33 Years R/o
Pahlejpur, Police Station - Gotiya Kothi, Distict Shivan (Bihar)
Presently R/o Patrapali, House Of Jaitram Patel, Police Station -
Kotra Road, Tehsil And District Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police
Station - Kotra Road, Tehsil And District Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Vipin Punjabi, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Raghavendra Verma, GA
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order On Board
06/07/2022
The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is in custody
in connection with Crime No.150/2011 registered at police station
Kotra Road, District Raigarh (CG) for the offence punishable under
Section 302 IPC and 25 and 27 of the Arms Act.
As per prosecution case, deceased Sanjeev Singh was engaged
as Contractor in Jindal Iron Factory Patrapali. It is alleged that the
deceased was having illicit relation with the wife of the the present
applicant. It is further case of prosecution that in the intervening night
of 18-19.09.2011, deceased was invited by the applicant and other
accused persons for consuming liquor and subsequent to that,
deceased was shot by the applicant with a desi katta causing him fatal
injuries, resulting in his death.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the conviction against the
applicant is erroneous and based on circumstantial evidence though
the FIR was lodged against unknown person. He submits that the
applicant is languishing in jail since 23.09.2011; the trial has been
concluded and he has been convicted vide judgment dated 30.06.2014
and therefore he has preferred appeal against the conviction before
this Court in Cr. A. No. 701/2014 and by judgment dated 22.02.2022,
the case was remanded to the trial court and looking to the conduct of
the prosecution it is clear that the trial will take time for its conclusion
and therefore he may be released on bail.
On the other hand counsel for the State opposes the bail
application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Earlier, the case has been
remanded back to the trial court vide order dated 22.02.2022 in Cr.A.
No. 701/2014 and the applicant filed bail application before the trial
court but the trial court dismissed the bail application filed by the
applicant. Thereafter the applicant moved application u/s. 482 Cr.P.C
vide Cr.M.P. No. 415/2022 before the Division Bench of this Court,
which was dismissed on 10.03.2022 and it was directed to the trial
court to comply the order passed in Cr.A. No. 701/2014 expeditiously.
Thus, considering the totality of the fact, in particular the
detention period of the applicant which is more than 11 years and
looking to the conduct of the prosecution it is clear that the trial will
take sometime for its conclusion, I am inclined to release him on
regular bail. Accordingly, his application filed under Section 439 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.
It is directed that in the event of the applicant's furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two local sureties for the
like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, he shall be
released on bail.
Sd/-
(Rajani Dubey) Judge
suguna
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!