Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karnani Properties Ltd vs J.S. India Pvt Ltd
2025 Latest Caselaw 3013 Cal/2

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3013 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2025

Calcutta High Court

Karnani Properties Ltd vs J.S. India Pvt Ltd on 12 November, 2025

Author: Aniruddha Roy
Bench: Aniruddha Roy
                        In the High Court at Calcutta
                            Commercial Division
                               Original Side

      Judgment (2)


PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY


                                        IA NO. GA-COM/5/2024
                                         In CS-COM/253/2024
                                         [Old No. CS/60/2021]

                                      KARNANI PROPERTIES LTD
                                                  VS
                                         J.S. INDIA PVT LTD.


For the plaintiff               : Mr. Shounak Mukhopadhyay, Adv.
                                  Ms. A. Poddar, Adv.



For the defendant/applicant :      Ms. Somali Mukhopadhyay, Adv.




Heard on            : November 12, 2025

Judgment on         : November 12, 2025



ANIRUDDHA ROY, J :

1. Mr. Sounak Mukhopadhyay, learned Advocate appears for the plaintiff

opposing this application.

2. Ms. Somali Mukhopadhyay, lerned Advocate appears for

defendant/applicant.

3. None appears for the defendant/applicant.

4. This is an application filed by the defendant with a prayer for rejection

of the plaint and consequently dismissal of the suit.

5. The grounds in support of such claim stated in the supporting affidavit

to the Masters Summons are quoted below:

"3. It would be evident from the plaint filed in the suit that it is

for eviction of the defendant from the suit premises on the

alleged cause of action of the defendant refusing to vacate the

suit premises despite the time mentioned in a notice under

section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 having lapsed.

4. Initially, the plaintiff had filed C.S No. 164 of 2020 in the

Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court in or

around February, 2021, the law as to whether a suit on the

purported cause of action mentioned above would in the

Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court or in the

Commercial Division of this Hon'ble Court, was nebulous. This

was not a conclusively decided issue.

5. In the said circumstance, upon this question being raised by

the defendant, the plaintiff chose to withdraw the suit by an

order dated 23rd February, 2021, and thereafter has filed the

present suit.

The order dated 23rd February, 2021, passed by the Hon'ble

Court is annexed hereto and marked with the letter "B".

However, in the interregnum, the law has been settled as the

defendant has been advised that the present suit being a suit for

IA No. GA-COM/5/2024 In CS-COM/253/2024 A.R., J.

eviction of a lessee/tenant/trespasser upon the time mentioned

in notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882

having expired does not come under the purview of commercial

dispute. The same is de bors a commercial contract and therefore

the suit filed before the Commercial Division, of the Hon'ble Court

is not maintainable and the same is required to be filed before

the ordinary original jurisdiction.

6.In the said circumstances, the plaint filed be rejected and

the suit dismissed since the present suit is not maintainable in

the Commercial Division."

6. The issue raised for claiming rejection of plaint on the above grounds

has already been decided by the Hon'ble Division Bench by a judgment

dated June 18, 2025, In the Matter of : T. E. Ghomas & Co. Ltd.

vs. Swarnalata Chopta Nee Kapur & Anr. rendered in IA No. GA-

COM/2/2024 in CS(COM)No. 4/2023 reported at (2025) SCC Online

(Cal) 5076, wherein it has been held that a suit for eviction in

connection with a lease pursuant to a notice issued under Section

106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, if otherwise is

characterized as a commercial suit within the meaning and scope of

the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the suit is to be classified as a

commercial suit and shall be maintained as such.

7. In view of the above, this application IA-GA-COM/5/2024 stands

dismissed, without any order as to cost.

IA No. GA-COM/5/2024 In CS-COM/253/2024 A.R., J.

8. On the prayer of the learned Advocate for the plaintiff, the hearing of

the suit is expedited by directing the parties to complete the

inspection, cross-order and discovery within 10 weeks from date in

accordance with law and to comply with all other formalities required

to be completed for a commercial suit in accordance with law.

(ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.)

Dg/

IA No. GA-COM/5/2024 In CS-COM/253/2024 A.R., J.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter