Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Samir Das vs Sukumar Das & Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 287 Cal/2

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 287 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2025

Calcutta High Court

Samir Das vs Sukumar Das & Ors on 7 July, 2025

                                             1

 OD-09
                           IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                                     ORIGINAL SIDE
                            Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction


                                     GA. No./07/2022
                                            In
                                  In Suit No./327/2004

                       SAMIR DAS VERSUS SUKUMAR DAS & ORS.



 Before:
 The Hon'ble Justice BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
 Date: 07th JULY 2025

                                                                                     Appearance:
                                                                             Mr. Samir Das, Adv.
                                                                    ...for the Plaintiff/Petitioner.
                                                                       Sukumar Das & Ors., Adv.
                                                              ...for the Defendants/Respondents.

The Court: This application filed by the Plaintiff/petitioner praying for the following

reliefs:

a) Declaration of the shares of the parties to this suit in the suit property more

particularly detailed in the schedules of Parts-I and II of Annexure 'A' and in

Annexure 'B' of the plaint and a preliminary decree be passed accordingly.

b) Appointment of a Commissioner of partition to frame a Scheme of partition

and divide the Suit Property by metes and bounds according to the shares

of the parties and allotment in severalty to the plaintiff a separate lot

according to the share of the plaintiff as may be determined.

c) The defendants and especially the defendant no. 1 be directed to render true

and faithful accounts of their dealings with the suit property and a decree

be passed to the extent of the sum found due and payable to the plaintiff

upon taking of such accounts.

It is the contention of the plaintiff/petitioner that although the partition suit

was contested for a long period but no fruitful outcome is derived from the same.

It is further contended that in the within statement all the defendants have

expressed their desire to partition with the suit property in accordance with 1/16th

share of the plaintiff/petitioner. It is also contended that in view of the admission

made by the respondents/defendants in their written statement the preliminary

decree in respect of the partition can be passed since the parties do not have any

dispute with regard to the share in respect of the properties which are intended to be

partitioned.

The petitioner/plaintiff has also filed supplementary affidavit with a prayer that

the suit be decreed in its preliminary form under Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil

Procedure declaring shares of the parties to schedule of part-I and II of Annexure 'A'

and in Annexure 'B' of the plaint.

Heard Learned Advocate for the parties perused the petition filed and materials

on record. Upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the Learned Advocates and

considering the written statement filed by Defendant no. 1, 2, 4 to 8, and 10 to 12 it

appears that the said defendants in para 14 of the written statement stated as

follows:

'The defendants are ready to partition the property in suit in accordance with

1/16th share of the plaintiff and the plaintiff never approached the defendants to

effect partition and there is no cause of action for instituting the suit and the

defendants pray that the properties in suit be partitioned according to the share of

the respective parties in suit.'

Upon considering the statement made in the written statement by defendant

no. 1, 2, 4 to 8, and 10 to 12 it appears that the said defendants have admitted the

share of the plaintiff and the defendants. Thus the said defendants have made

admissions with regard to the shares of the parties and hence Judgment can be

passed on admissions as per Order 6 Rule 12(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. With

regard to Defendant no-3 and 9 as the said defendants did not file written statement

it has to be inferred that the said defendants are not at issue with the plaintiff on the

statements made in the plaint.

Thus the plaintiff/petitioner is entitled to an order for declaration of shares.

Let there be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the Notice of motion dated 6th day

of May 2022.

The parties do get a preliminary decree as prayed for in prayer(a) of the Notice

of Motion dated 6th day of May 2022. Let the preliminary Decree be drawn up and

completed in terms of this Order.

Parties are granted liberty to partition by metes and bounds in terms of

preliminary Decree failing which partition Commissioner is to be appointed.

Fix 02/08/2025 for report of amicable partition and further orders.

(BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.)

A.Bhar(P.A)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter