Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5894 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2023
04.09.2023 Serial no. 12 [G.S.D]
CRR 795 of 2023 With CRAN 1 of 2023
In the matter of : Debanuj Chakraborty ... ... Petitioner
Mr. Debajyoti Deb Mr. Somdyuti Parekh
... for the petitioner Ms. Minal Palana
... For the O.P.
This revisional application has been preferred against
an order dated 24th January, 2023 passed by the Learned
Additional Sessions Judge, 14th Court, Alipore in Criminal
Appeal No. 70 of 2021 wherein the subject-matter of
challenge was an order dated 16th March, 2021 passed by
the Learned JM, 6th Court, Alipore in C. Case No. 2312 of
2019 under Section 23 of the PWDV Act.
The Appellate Court, in fact, affirmed the judgment
and order passed by the Learned JM, 6th Court, Alipore which
was passed on 16.3.2021 dismissing the appeal which was
preferred.
Learned Advocate for the O.P. has taken out a
vacating application being CRAN 1 of 2023. I find that at the
time of admission of the present revisional application, a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court, was pleased to grant interim
order to the extent that the present petitioner would go on
paying a sum of Rs.7000/- per month without prejudice to
the rights and contentions, which may arise in future.
The applicant/mother is a teacher of Jewish Girls
School. The petitioner in the main revisional application is
working as an Executive at Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance
Company Limited.
It has been submitted by Mr. Deb, Learned Advocate
for the petitioner, that the girl is aged about six years and is
studying at South Point School.
Having regard to the status of the parties, I am of
the view that a quantum of Rs.15,000/- as awarded by the
Learned JM and affirmed by the Learned Appellate Court,
calls for no interference in view of the cost of education
along with the attending expenses, is required to be incurred
for the said purposes, leaving aside the rest of the
expenditures.
Consequently, the interim order dated 21.3.2023
passed by this Court in the revisional application is hereby
vacated.
The arrears, if any, be paid by three instalments.
Having regard to the quantum of Rs.15,000/- being
fit and proper, I am of the opinion that no interference is
called for in the present revisional application, as the
amount was decided at an interim stage.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to adduce
evidence at the appropriate stage of the trial expressing his
incapacity to pay such amount which would include within its
ambit, his earnings as well as other liabilities to be incurred.
The Learned Trial Court would consider the same in
accordance with law and thereafter decide regarding the
quantum to be awarded at the final stage of the case.
With the aforesaid observations, CRR 795 of 2023 is
disposed of.
CRAN 1 of 2023 is allowed.
Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed
of.
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!