Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5890 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2023
04.09.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ct. no.654 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
D/L 48
ab ,,
FMAT 445 of 2020
With
CAN 1 of 2022
,
Omrawati Devi & Ors.
Vs.
National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
,,
Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy
... for the appellants-claimants
Re : FMAT 445 of 2020
This appeal is preferred against the judgment and
award dated 13th March, 2020 passed by the learned
Additional District Judge-cum-Judge, Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, 3rd Court, Asansol in M.A.C. Case No.
03 of 2012 (Old No. 12 of 2011) under Section 166 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
As per report of the Additional Stamp Reporter
dated 4th September, 2023, the appeal is preferred within
the statutory period of limitation.
Accordingly, the appeal is formally admitted and
registered.
Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy, learned advocate for the
appellants-claimants seeks liberty to correct the surname
of appellant no. 3 from "Harihan" to "Harijan".
Liberty is granted to correct the same.
2
Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy, learned advocate for the
appellants-claimants submits that all the relevant papers
are with him and as such, calling for of lower court
records be dispensed with at present and he undertakes
to prepare informal paper books.
In view of the above submissions, calling for of
lower court records is dispensed with for the time being.
Learned advocate for the appellants-claimants is
directed to prepare and file requisite number of informal
paper books incorporating all relevant papers and
documents including the pleadings and evidence, both
oral and documentary, in printed or typewritten or
cyclostyled form, as the case may be, out of court, within
four weeks from date.
Mr. Roy, learned advocate for the appellants-
claimants also submits for dispensing with service of
notice of appeal upon the respondent Nos. 2 and 3,
owners of the offending vehicle, since they did not contest
the claim application. It is found from the impugned
judgment that the respondent Nos. 2 and 3-owners of the
offending vehicle did not contest the claim application
and the same has been disposed of ex parte against them.
In the aforesaid backdrop, service of notice of appeal
upon the respondent Nos. 2 and 3-owners of the
offending vehicle stands dispensed with.
The appellants-claimants are directed to deposit
talabana costs together with written up notice form for
causing service of notice of appeal upon the respondent
no. 1-insurance company.
Let the matter appear under the heading "Hearing"
after four weeks.
< (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!