Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3194 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2023
ORDER OD - 1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
APO/246/2018
WITH
WPO/94/2015
ECGC LIMITED
[FORMERLY EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORP. OF INDIA]
VERSUS
MITTAL TECHNOPACK PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble Justice SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
The Hon'ble Justice RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Date : 24th November 2023.
Appearance:
Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, Advocate
Mr. Amitava Mitra, Advocate
Ms. Antara Choudhury, Advocate
... for appellant.
Mr. Soumya Majumder, Advocate
Mr. Debraj Sahu, Advocate
Ms. Susrea Mitra, Advocate
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Advocate
Ms. Abhipiya Sarkar, Advocate
... for respondents.
The Court:- Heard Sri Dhruba Ghosh, learned senior advocate, assisted
by Sri Soumyajit Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant/respondent and Sri
Soumya Majumder, learned counsel, assisted by Sri Debraj Sahu, learned
counsel for the respondents / writ petitioners.
This appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 27.01.2017 in WPO
No.94 of 2015 [Mittal Technopack Private Limited and another v. ECGC
Limited] passed by the Learned Single Judge, whereby the order of the
appellant/respondent rejecting the insurance claim of the respondents / writ
petitioners was quashed and a direction was issued to pay the claim amount.
Submission advanced by the learned senior advocate on behalf of the
appellant/respondent is that there is no dispute that the insurance policy of
the respondents / writ petitioners contained a clause for payment of premium
in four instalments, but the point of dispute is that the third instalment of
Rs.2,27,500/- which fell due on 28.06.2012 was paid on 03.10.2012, whereas
the shipment in question took place on 27.07.2012 and as such, the shipment
in question was not covered under a valid policy. His contention is that in
such circumstances, there being no valid policy for that particular period
commencing from 28.06.2012 till the date of payment i.e. 03.10.2012, the
claim in respect of shipment made on 27.07.2012 could not be allowed. He
drew our attention to Section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938 to support his
submission that payment of premium of insurance policy is a pre-condition for
a valid policy to be enforced.
As prayed by learned senior advocate, list on 28.11.2023 at 10:30 AM for
further hearing.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.) s. kumar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!