Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1980 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2023
ASR 1-3.
24.3.2023
CPAN 88 of 2023
Rupa & Co Ltd. & Anr.
Vs.
Mr. Firhad Hakim & Ors.
In
FMA 299 of 2019
With
CPAN 1453 of 2022
With
CPAN 384 of 2021
Rupa & Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Vs.
Debasish Sen & Ors.
Mr. Jishnu Saha
Mr. Arindam Banerjee
Mr. Tanmoy Agarwal
Mr. Sandip Agarwal
........Advocates for the petitioners
Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury
Mr. Chayan Gupta
Mr. Sandip Dasgupta
Mr. Saaquib Siddique
Mr. Aviroop Mitra
........Advocates for the contemnors
We have heard learned counsel for the
parties.
Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, learned Advocate
appearing for the alleged contemnor nos. 1-6
shows us the correspondence exchanged between
West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development
Corporation Limited and the Government of West
Bengal.
2
It appears that compliance with our
judgement and order dated 10th February, 2020 is
now dependent on the terms of approval of the
said Cabinet.
According to the terms and condition of
their service the alleged contmnors can only
execute the conveyance upon approval and on the
terms of approval by the Cabinet. The alleged
contemnors are ready and willing to do so,
subject to the above condition.
The letter of the department of Urban
Development and Municipal Affairs, Government
of West Bengal dated 2nd December, 2022 to the
respondent corporation, reveals that the Cabinet
has approved the execution of conveyance by the
said corporation on 25th November, 2022 but
"subject to the condition that present market
price will have to be realized".
The decision of the Cabinet is not before us.
If this is actually the decision of the Cabinet
prima facie, it appears to be prima facie
absolutely contrary to our said order dated 10th
February, 2020.
The operative part of the said order is set
out below:
"For those reasons, the appeal
and the writ succeed. The decision
taken in the 67th Meeting of the Board of
Directors of HIDCO on 30th April, 2011
the letter of HIDCO dated 24th August,
2012, 6th December, 2012 and 14th
January, 2013 are set aside. The appeal
(FMA 299 of 2019) is allowed. The
impugned judgment and order dated 7th
March, 2019 is set aside.
No Order as to costs."
The relevant prayer (g) of the writ petition is
also set out below:
(g) A Writ of or in the nature of
Mandamus and/or order or orders and/or
direction or directions of like nature
commanding the respondents to
forthwith execute and register the deed
of sale/conveyance for sale of 30 cottahs
of land bearing Plot No. 11E/17 within
sub-CBD of AA-IID of New Town, Kolkata
in favour of the petitioner No. 1 on
freehold basis in terms of the letter of
allotment being No. M-1343/2010 dated
6th April, 2011 being annexure "P-1"
hereto;
It is plain from the above that the
conveyance had to be executed for a
consideration according to the letter of allotment
dated 6th April, 2011.
In those circumstances, at this point of
time, we direct the following:
(a) Let the Cabinet decision in a sealed cover be
produced before us at the next date of hearing;
(b) Let a copy of the contempt petition be served
on all the alleged contemnors;
(c) Let copies of all orders passed in connection
with it be served upon each and every member of
the Cabinet;
The Cabinet is given a chance to revise its
decision as communicated by the said letter
dated 2nd December, 2022.
The Advocate-on-record for the petitioner
shall effect the above service on the members of
the Cabinet.
List this application on an available day
for this bench in May, 2023.
( I. P. Mukerji,J.)
(Md. Nizamuddin,J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!