Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1599 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023
IA No. GA 1 of 2023
APDT No. 14 2023
with
CS No. 51 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
In appeal from its
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(Commercial Bench)
Emporis Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Versus
Kailash Kumar Tibrewal & Ors.
Before:
The Hon'ble Justice I. P. MUKERJI
And
The Hon'ble Justice BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Date: 17th July 2023
Appearance:
Mr. Siddhartha Mitra, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Raj Ratna Sen, Advocate
Mr. Ayan Dutta, Advocate
Mr. Pradip Sarawagi, Advocate
for the appellant
Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Advocate
Mr. Arinudh Agarwal, Advocate
Mr. Sashwat Nayak, Advocate
Ms. D. Mukherji, Advocate
for respondent no. 1
Mr. S. S. Sarkar, Advocate Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3
The Court: We admit the appeal.
Order in terms of prayer (a).
As the respondents are represented by learned advocates, we
dispense with the formalities regarding issuance and service of the notice
of appeal. All other formalities are also dispensed with.
Advocate-on-record for the appellant shall prepare and file an
informal paper book in this court by 11th August 2023, serving copies
thereof upon the advocates-on-record for the respondents at least 7 days
before the date of hearing of the appeal.
List the appeal for hearing on 21st August 2023, at the top.
This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 14th June
2023.
In the suit a terms of settlement was sought to be put in by the
plaintiff and the defendant nos. 1 and 2, the respondents herein. The
appellant/defendant no. 3 objected to a decree being passed in
accordance with those terms on the ground that it affected their rights
and was not signed by them.
The court after considering the argument of the parties approved
the settlement as lawful and passed the said decree in terms thereof.
The respondents are the shareholders of the appellant company.
The respondent/plaintiff lent and advanced money to these
respondents/defendants. The settlement was between these parties by
transfer of shares of the respondents/defendants in favour of the
respondent/plaintiff which the appellant is unwilling to accept. The
appellant says that they have not signed the terms but were seen as
bound by them by the said respondents.
Mr. Banerjee raises the point of maintainability which is kept
open.
This question has to be gone into in the appeal.
As an interim order, we make it absolutely clear that this
judgment and decree dated 14th June 2023 or the terms of settlement
will not bind the appellant or compel them to perform any act under the
decree which they are unwilling to do.
The application (IA No. GA 1 of 2023) is disposed of.
As affidavits were not invited, the allegations contained in the
application are not admitted.
(I. P. MUKERJI, J.)
(BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.)
R. Bose
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!