Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4742 Cal
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2022
25.07.2022
rc/ct.no.13
Item No.430
WPA No. 11725 of 2022
Soma Chakraborty & Anr.
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Goutam Kr. Maity ...for the petitioner
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is kept
with the record.
The petitioner's husband was an Assistant
Teacher of a High School who died on 13.01.2021. The
pension payment order was issued on 26.04.2022. He
had completed all his pension related formalities prior
to his retirement. However, the concerned authorities
delayed the gratuity and arrear pensionary benefit
amount ultimately released the same on 13.05.2022.
The petitioners herein seek interest to be paid on
the arrear pension amount for the interim period of
delay in receipt of the arrear pension amount. There is
a considerable delay in filing the writ petition, which
the petitioners seek to justify by stating that there is no
statutory period of limitation and neither parties have
suffered due to this delay and, therefore, the instant
petition should be allowed.
The petitioners rely upon an order in WP No.
17557(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of
West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a Co-ordinate Bench had
2
relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of
Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8
SCC 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment
or refixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex Court
had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as
it does not affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of
West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to
pay interest to the petitioners @8% per annum on the
revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount
calculated on and from 13.01.2021 till the date of
actual payment. Such payment is to be made within a
period of eight weeks from the date of communication
of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are
deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties.
(Rajasekhar Mantha,J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!