Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4694 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2022
22.07.22
03 Ct. No.11
Sws.M
SAT 20 of 2019
Sushil Chowdhury
vs.
Sumita Banerjee @ Sushmita Banerjee
Ms. Sreetama Neogi
...for the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mitra
Mr. Debangshu Dinda
.....for the respondent
Party/Parties is/are represented in the order of
their name/names as printed above in the cause-title.
The matter is listed today as 'To Be mentioned'
on the prayer of the learned counsel for the
respondent. Learned Counsel for the respondent
submits that in the judgment dated 17 th March, 2022
at page 2 the Appeal number is wrongly mentioned as
5 of 2019 instead of Appeal No. 5 of 2015 and at page
No. 12 in paragraph 5 line no. 2 the Appeal number is
wrongly mentioned as 21 of 2015 instead of Appeal
No. 5 of 2015.
In view of the above, in the judgment dated 17 th
March, 2022 at page no.2 at paragraph 1, the Appeal
number shall be read as 5 of 2015 instead of Appeal
No. 5 of 2019 and at page No. 12 in paragraph 5, line
No. 2, the Appeal number shall be read as 5 of 2015
instead of Appeal No. 21 of 2015.
This order be treated as part of the order dated
17th March, 2022.
Registry is directed to take appropriate steps.
All parties to act on a server copy of this order
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Krishna Rao, J.) (Subrata Talukdar, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!