Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4542 Cal
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2022
D/L68 C.R.R.2672 of 2009 July 20,
In Re: An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Bpg.
Procedure, 1973;
Sri Prasenjit Roy Versus Sri Kausik Dey
Records of the revisional application reflect that although
the revisional application was filed in the year 2009, but till date,
the same has not been admitted.
The subject matter of challenge relates to an order dated
28th May, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Fast Track, Fourth Court, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur in Criminal
Revision No.22 of 2008.
The genesis of the case relates to the order dated 15th
April, 2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court,
Tamluk in C.R. Case No.571 of 2006 under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act. The impugned order reflects that on
completion of evidence, an application was filed before the learned
trial court regarding the signature not being genuine. The learned
trial court considered the evidence including the examination under
Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also exhibits 11
and 11/1. On an appreciation of evidence of the case, learned
revisional court came to the finding that the application has been
filed by the petitioner to drag the trial of the case.
Having regard to the time period which has elapsed in
the meantime and the observations made by the learned revisional
court/sessions court in its judgment and order dated 28th May,
2009, I am of the opinion that no interference is called for.
Accordingly, CRR 2672 of 2009 is dismissed.
Pending connected application, if any, is consequently
disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!